+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Effect of crystalline sweeteners on the water activity and shelf stability of osmotically dehydrated guava

Effect of crystalline sweeteners on the water activity and shelf stability of osmotically dehydrated guava

Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 11(6): 755-761

Intermediate moisture (IM) sweetened guava slices were prepared using dry crystalline sweeteners namely sucrose commercial grade and sucrose/glucose (7:3) mixture. the guava slices after osmotic dehydration in these sweeteners were subsequently cabinet dehydrated to a moisture content of 21%. the water activity (aw) after osmotic and cabinet dehydration was determined. The aw of the slices osmotically dehydrated in 60% sucrose and sucrose/glucose (7:3) mixture was 0.80 and 0.77 respectively. The aw of these slices after cabinet dehydration was reduced to 0.66 and 0.63 respectively. Sucrose/glucose (7:3) mixture was found to be more effective sweetener in lowering the water activity and better shelf stability of the slices. No significant changes were noted in organoleptic characteristic of the slices during four month storage studies, however, the ascorbic acid lost significantly.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 002811383

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Effect of sweeteners on the water activity and shelf stability of osmotically dehydrated persimmon slices. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 19(4): 563-570, 2003

Influence of various sweeteners and their concentrations during osmosis on the water activity and shelf stability of intermediate moisture guava slices. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 12(3): 361-368, 1996

Effect of crystalline sucrose on the water activity and overall acceptability of osmotically dehydrated apple slices. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 18(1): 99-105, 2002

Calcium lactate effect on the shelf life of osmotically dehydrated guavas. Journal of Food Science 75(9): E612-E619, 2011

Microbial and sensory attributes of osmotically dehydrated guava slices during storage. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 20(4): 635-641, 2004

Influence of operating conditions on sensory quality of minimally processed osmotically dehydrated guava. Journal of food quality 26(2): 91-103, 2003

Influence of crystalline sucrose and chemical preservatives on the water activity and shelf stability of intermediate banana chips. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 10(6): 721-726, 1994

Drying of tomatoes osmotically dehydrated and not osmotically dehydrated. Revista Universidade Rural Serie Ciencias Exatas e da Terra 21(Suplemento): 21-30, 2002

Effect of fat content and corn sweeteners on selected sensory attributes and shelf stability of vanilla ice cream. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 47(2): 69-75, 1994

Transfer of water and soluble substances in osmotically dehydrated apples. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technica Agraria 2(1): 13-22, 2003

Water content, water activity and water structure: three approaches to water/food interactions - application to the storage stability of crystalline sugar in silo. Zuckerindustrie 126(11): 880-884, 2001

Effect of ethanol, acetic acid and hot water vapours on the shelf-life of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Acta Alimentaria Budapest 34(1): 49-57, 2005

Influence of water activity on stability of vitamins in dehydrated foods. Water activity: influences on food quality: a treatise on the influence of bound and free water on the quality and stability of foods and other natural products: ub 1981) 531-566, 1981

Comparison of pretreatment methods on water and solid diffusion kinetics of osmotically dehydrated mangos. Journal of food engineering 53(2): 133-142, 2002

Effect of various sweeteners on chemical composition of guava slices. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 21(1): 131-134, 2005