+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Estimating bacterial density from tube dilution data by a Bayesian method

Estimating bacterial density from tube dilution data by a Bayesian method

Food Microbiology (London) 13(5): 341-363

We have developed a statistical computer program based on a Bayesian approach to estimate bacterial density from tube dilution data. The program calculates an expectation, a mode (equivalent to the traditional most probable number (MPN)) and a median as point estimates of the bacterial density. The Bayesian analysis provides a probability density function which reflects the knowledge accumulated about the bacterial density by observing the data. Its expectation is a summary value that incorporates the shape and skewness of the distribution. On the other hand, the MPN (mode) only uses the single most likely value and ignores other values that are consistent with the data. As a result the MPN consistently underestimates the bacterial density and is likely to produce large errors. Thus we recommend the use of the expectation as an estimator for most problems. The theoretical basis of the Bayesian approach and its application to Salmonella data is discussed. Tables of results for different combinations of tube dilutions are also presented.

Accession: 002831310

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1006/fmic.1996.0040

Download PDF Full Text: Estimating bacterial density from tube dilution data by a Bayesian method

Related references

Estimating bacterial populations by the dilution method. Biometrika 31(1/2): 167-180, 1939

Inaccuracies in the disc method for determining bacterial sensitivity to aureomycin discovered by comparison with the tube-dilution method. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 40(1): 149-153, 1952

Note on Estimating Bacterial Populations by the Dilution Method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 24(5): 212-215, 1938

Note on the successive dilution method for estimating bacterial populations. Zentralbl Bakt Ii Abt 99: 318-320, 1938

The tube dilution method of determining bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 21(9): 884-891, 1951

The accuracy of the dilution method of estimating the density of a population of micro-organisms. Iowa State Coll Jour Sci 6(3): 251-262, 1932

On the dilution errors involved in estimating bacterial numbers by the plating method. Biometrics 23(1): 158-159, 1967

Tube dilution method for bacterial sensitivities to antibiotics as standardized for D.V.A. Hospital laboratories. Treatment Services Bulletin. Canada. Department of Veterans' Affairs 8(7): 378-380, 1953

Estimating canopy density by the vertical tube method. Forest Ecology and Management 11(1/2): 139-144, 1985

An empirical Bayesian method for estimating biological networks from temporal microarray data. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 9: Article 9-Article 9, 2010

Validity of the tritiated thymidine method for estimating bacterial growth rates: measurement of isotope dilution during DNA synthesis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 48(6): 1076-1083, 1984

Sampling errors in the determination of bacterial or virus density by the dilution method. Journal of Hygiene 39(3): 289-293, 1939

Correlation between results of the tube dilution method for determining bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics and the results of the administration of these antibiotics to patients with staphylococcic bacteremia. Antibiotics Annual 6: 748-756, 1958

Estimating abundance of pelagic fishes using gillnet catch data in data-limited fisheries: a Bayesian approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64(7): 3, 2007

Some bayesian statistical techniques useful in estimating frequency and density. U S Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report Wildlife (203): 1-10, 1977