EurekaMag.com logo
+ Translate

Management of dry-land farming system in north eastern Australia: how can scientists impact on farmers' decision making?


, : Management of dry-land farming system in north eastern Australia: how can scientists impact on farmers' decision making?. Agricultural Science 10(3): 34-37

The article first considers the challenges faced by Australian farmers, and which researchers are trying to address.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service)

Accession: 002889806

Submit PDF Full Text: Here


Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:
Close
Close

Related references

Coleno, F.C.; Duru, M.; Theau, J.P., 2005: A method to analyse decision-making processes for land use management in livestock farming. In order to maintain their income, using European Union grants, mountain livestock farms need to have a production plan based on animal production and environmental objectives. To help farmers to do this, we develop a method allowing the evaluatio...

Merot,A.; Bergez,J.E.; Capillon,A.; Wery,J., 2008: Analysing farming practices to develop a numerical, operational model of farmers decision-making processes an irrigated hay cropping system in France. Conventional water management in the Crau plain needs to be modified to ensure higher irrigation efficiency, better crop production and quality, and reduced environmental impacts. Because experimental approaches to test modifications of water mana...

Sugai, Y.; Teixeira Filho, A.R., 1986: Impact on farmers' decision-making by farm management and computer sciences in the turbulent economy. The processes of farmer decision are illustrated in a computerized procedure devised in Brazil: PROFAZENDA. A sample of 40 farms in six states of Brazil was processed and analysed using this system. Resource use was optimized for all farms, result...

Anonymous, 2006: Research and development of business analysis and planning system by text-mining approach for farmers study of management policy decision-making

Udovc, A., 1997: The decision support system KMETIJA - a tool to help farmers at production-economic decision-making. The paper presents the decision support system KMETIJA (Farm) which is intended to be used by farmers, extension workers, decision makers and others involved in agriculture in Slovenia. KMETIJA consists of three parts: data banks, simulation core,...

Udovc, A., 1996: The decision support system Kmetija - a tool to help farmers at production-economic decision-making. The article presents the decision support system KMETIJA which offers farmers, decision makers and other subjects active in rural areas the potential to evaluate the impacts that new or changed socioeconomic activities or environmental influences...

Anonymous, 2006: Credit utilisation, decision-making pattern and marketing behaviour of farmers in different coastal farming systems

Mele, P.M.; Carter, M.R., 1999: Impact of crop management factors in conservation tillage farming on earthworm density, age structure and species abundance in south-eastern Australia. Management practices associated with conservation tillage farming for cereals such as stubble retention and management, greater utilization of herbicides, and soil acidity amelioration were assessed for their influence on earthworm density, age st...

Plummer, O.E., 1980: Economic strategies in Mfantse farmers' decision making: land access and oil palms. Economic strategies employed in an Mfantse farming village in the Central Region of Southern Ghana in gaining access to land, and in marketing the harvest of the local wild oil palms are studied. Access to land varies according to crop: direct acc...

Chilman, K.; Hampton, G., 1982: A new recreation inventory system to aid land management decision-making: an application at Lake Tahoe Management of dispersed recreation on large wildland areas, National Forests. Miscellaneous ication University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: 8) 42-44