+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Mating systems and the evolutionary transition between haploidy and diploidy

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 57(3): 197-218
Mating systems and the evolutionary transition between haploidy and diploidy
According to the 'masking hypothesis', diploids gain an immediate fitness advantage over haploids because diploids, with two copies of every gene, are better able to survive the effects of deleterious recessive mutations. Masking in diploids is, however, a double-edged sword: it allows mutations to persist over time. In contrast, deleterious mutations are revealed in haploid individuals and are more rapidly eliminated by selection, creating genetic associations that are favourable to haploidy. We model various mating schemes and show that assortative mating, selfing, and apomixis maintain the genetic associations that favour haploidy. These results suggest that a correlation should exist between mating system and ploidy level, with outcrossing favouring diploid life cycles and inbreeding or asexual reproduction favouring haploid life cycles. This prediction can be tested in groups, such as the Chlorophyta, with extensive variation both in life cycle and in reproductive system. Confirming or rejecting this prediction in natural populations would constitute the first empirical test of the masking hypothesis as a force shaping the evolution of life cycles.

Accession: 002891554

DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb00309.x

Download PDF Full Text: Mating systems and the evolutionary transition between haploidy and diploidy

Related references

Mutational load and the transition between diploidy and haploidy in experimental populations of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetica 121(3): 285-293, 2004

The evolution of haploidy and diploidy. Current Biology 18(24): R1121-4, 2009

Conversion of diploidy to haploidy. Nature 403(6771): 723-724, 2000

The coexistence of haploidy and diploidy in yeasts. Experientia 15(3): 99-100, 1959

Converting diploidy to haploidy for genetic diagnosis. Official Gazette of the United States Patent & Trademark Office Patents 1259(1), June 4, 2002

Origin of sex for error repair. I. Sex, diploidy, and haploidy. Theoretical Population Biology 47(1): 18-55, 1995

Genome changes after gene duplication: haploidy vs. diploidy. Genetics 186(1): 287-294, 2011

Mass action models of plant mating systems the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. American Naturalist 138(3): 606-622, 1991

Haploidy versus diploidy in the reproduction of cell type. Reproduction: molecular, subcellular, and cellular. 24th Symposium of the Society for Developmental Biology, Academic Press Inc. New York., 217-41, 1965

Ecological models of plant mating systems and the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. (see Book Title) [Author] Wyatt, R (Ed ) Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction: New approaches; Conference, Athens, Georgia, USA, April 12-14, 1991 xiii+397p Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc : New York, New York, USA; London, England, UK Illus ISBN 0-412-03021-7 : 169-191, 1992