EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The concept and application of early economic period threshold: the case of DCPA in onions (Allium cepa)


Weed Science 43(4): 634-639
The concept and application of early economic period threshold: the case of DCPA in onions (Allium cepa)
The question of when to control weeds traditionally has been approached with the calculation of critical periods (CP) based on crop yields. The concept of economic critical period (ECP) and early (EEPT) and late (LEPT) economic period thresholds are presented as a comprehensive approach to answer the same question based on economic losses and costs of control. ECP is defined as the period when the benefit of controlling weeds is greater than its cost. EEPT and LEPT are the limits of the ECP and can be used to determine when first and last weed control measures should be performed. Calculation of KEPT accounts for the economic losses due to weed competition that occur between planting and postemergence weed control. In this way it is possible to better evaluate the economic feasibility of using preplant or preemergence control tactics. The EEPT for DCPA application is analyzed in the context of onion production in Colorado. The KEPT for DCPA application was calculated from an empirical regression model that assessed the impact of weed load and time of weed removal on onion yields. The KEPT was affected by control efficacy, weed-free yield, DCPA cost, and onion price. DCPA application was economically advisable in only one of 20 fields analyzed because of the low DCPA efficacy (60%).


Accession: 002980641



Related references

Critical period for weed competition in onions (Allium cepa L.). University of Aden Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 5(2): 355-360, 2001

Chemical top killing for onions (Allium cepa L.). III. Application in farming practice. Archiv fur Gartenbau: 5 (5) 231-237, 1977

A contribution to the study of weed control in garlic (Allium sativum L.), shallots (Allium ascalonicum L.) and onions (Allium cepa L.). Compte Rendu de la 11e Conference du COLUMA (Tome 2): 470-478, 1981

Contribution to the study of the control of weeds in crops of garlic (Allium sativum), shallots (Allium ascalonium) and onions (Allium cepa). Compte Rendu de la 7e Conference du COLUMA Comite Francais de Lutte contre les Mauvaises Herbes: 670-678, 1973

Phosphorus sources and methods of application to the soil in onions (Allium cepa L.) grown from sets. Cientfica received 1984; 10(2): 241-245, 1982

Do changes in chemical composition during storage of raw onions (Allium cepa) influence the quality of deep fat fried onions?. Agri Food Quality II: quality management of fruits and vegetables from field to table, Turku, Finland, 22-25 April, 1998: 138-141, 1999

Studies on heterosis, combining ability and gene action for quantitative characters in bulb onions (Allium cepa L. var. cepa). Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciencesrecd 1986; 18(3): 241, 1984

Role of garlic (Allium sativum L.) and onions (Allium cepa L.) in health management. Acta Horticulturae (688): 143-150, 2005

Megaspore culture of interspecific allium cepa x allium fistulosum hyperploid onions. Hortscience (SUPPL): 85, 1989

Testing onions m allium cepa m and other allium m species for resistance to botrytis allii. Euphytica 19(2): 152-162, 1970