EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The effect of substrate-enriched and substrate-impoverished housing environments on the diversity of behaviour in pigs






Behaviour 133(9-10): 741-761

The effect of substrate-enriched and substrate-impoverished housing environments on the diversity of behaviour in pigs

In intensive farming situations, growing animals are housed in relatively barren environments. The lack of opportunity to perform substrate-interactive and manipulative behaviour patterns may affect the expression and organization of these behaviours. However, making direct comparisons of the behaviour expressed in environments of differing physical complexity is difficult. In this experiment a relative diversity index was used to compare the behavioural repertoires of pigs housed in two different environments for a period of five months. One group of pigs (substrate-enriched) had straw, forest bark and branches added to the standard pens and the other group (substrate-impoverished) did not. The pigs were individually housed, and their behaviour was focal sampled in these pens on one day each month. It was shown that the relative diversity of manipulative behaviour shown by the pigs in the substrate-impoverished environment was lower than in the pigs in the substrate-enriched environment (p lt 0.05). The relative diversity of the whole behavioural repertoire shown by the pigs in the substrate-impoverished environment also tended to be lower than that in the substrate-enriched environment (p = 0.06). It is concluded that this may be due to a difference between the two groups in motivation to interact with and manipulate objects, or a function of the manipulable quality of the substrates available to them. Alternatively, exposure to substrate-impoverished environments may interfere with the ability to express manipulative behaviour. Both situations pose a threat to the welfare of growing pigs resident in barren environments.


Accession: 002984158

DOI: 10.1163/156853996x00459



Related references

Experience in substrate-enriched and substrate-impoverished environments affects behaviour of pigs in a T-maze task. Behaviour 134(9-10): 643-659, 1997

Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions. Animal Behaviour 60(3): 385-394, 2000

The effect of barren and enriched housing environments on the interactive behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44(2-4): 263, 1995

Behavioural development of pigs with different coping characteristics in barren and substrate-enriched housing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93(3/4): 213-228, 2005

Effects of enriched and impoverished housing environments on the electrocorticograms (ECoGs) of middle-aged rats. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 57(4): 687-691, 1995

Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems: 1. Hanging toy versus rootable substrate. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99(3/4): 222-229, 2006

Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs housing in two different systems - 1. Hanging toy versus rootable substrate. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99(3-4): 222-229, 2006

The effect of housing with or without substrate on responsiveness to novelty in growing pigs. Proceedings of the 30th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology: 14-17 August 1996 Guelph Ontario Canada, 1996

The differential effect of impoverished and enriched environments on the number of round asymmetrical and flat symmetrical synapses in the visual cortex of cat. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 11(1): 226, 1985

Determination of the substrate binding mode to the active site iron of (S)-2-hydroxypropylphosphonic acid epoxidase using 17O-enriched substrates and substrate analogues. Biochemistry 46(44): 12628-12638, 2007