EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities



An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities



Ecology 79(7): 2482-2493



The response of montane butterflies to a 1,300 m elevational gradient in the Toiyabe Range, Nevada, was examined. This study was conducted to test whether the elevational ranges of these butterflies conformed to Rapoport's elevational rule and whether the Rapoport-rescue hypothesis explained the observed species richness patterns. The rule states that species at higher elevations have greater elevational ranges, whereas the hypothesis holds that emigrants from higher elevation populations inflate the species richness of lower-elevation sites. Although species richness peaked at intermediate elevations, elevation and species richness were significantly negatively correlated. Butterflies in species-rich areas had significantly narrower elevational ranges than species in species-poorer areas. The evidence was consistent with Rapoport's elevational rule, but the Rapoport-rescue hypothesis did not completely account for the elevational gradient species richness.

Accession: 003037954

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2482:AETORS]2.0.CO;2

Download PDF Full Text: An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities



Related references

Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport's rule. Ecography 25(1): 25-32, 2002

Harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) species distribution along three Neotropical elevational gradients: an alternative rescue effect to explain Rapoport's rule?. Journal of Biogeography 33(2): 361-375, 2006

Elevational gradients in a montane butterfly community. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 77(3 SUPPL PART 2): 142, 1996

Elevational diversity gradients, biogeography and the structure of montane mammal communities in the intermountain region of North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography uary; 10(1): 77-100, 2001

The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: An extension of Rapoport's latitudinal rule to altitude. American Naturalist 140(6): 893-911, 1992

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and Rapoport's rule revisited: A review of recent work and what can parasites teach us about the causes of the gradients?. Ecography 22(6): 593-613, 1999

Climate-based empirical models show biased predictions of butterfly communities along environmental gradients. Ecography 35(8): 0-0, 2012

Rapoport's Rule is a local phenomenon and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Biodiversity Letters 3(1): 10-13, 1996

Rapoport's rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. American Naturalist 142(1): 1-16, 1993

Elevational and age gradients in hawaiian usa montane rainforest foliar and soil nutrients. Oecologia (Berlin) 77(4): 565-570, 1988

Elevational and age gradients in Hawaiian montane rainforest: foliar and soil nutrients. Oecologia 77(4): 565-570, 1988

Bergmanns rule does not apply to geometrid moths along an elevational gradient in an Andean montane rain forest. Global Ecology and Biogeography. January; 131: 7-14, 2004

Patterns of turtle species' geographic range size and a test of Rapoport's rule. Ecography 22(4): 436-446, 1999

Geographic and climatic range sizes of Australian eucalypts and a test of Rapoport's rule. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 5(3): 128-142, 1996