EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Artificial defoliation, decapitation of the terminal bud, and removal of the apical tip of the shoot in sessile oak seedlings and consequences on subsequent growth






Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27(10): 1614-1621

Artificial defoliation, decapitation of the terminal bud, and removal of the apical tip of the shoot in sessile oak seedlings and consequences on subsequent growth

To simulate the damage caused by herbivores and fungi and study their effects on 1-year-old nursery-grown sessile Oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) seedlings, (1) the portion of stem produced during the first growth flush, referred to as the growth unit (GU), was artificially defoliated, decapitated, or both or (2) the apical part of the GU was removed in the period of apparent rest. In comparison to control seedlings, defoliation, decapitation combined with defoliation, and apical part removal (1) caused earlier production of the GU in the second flush, (2) reduced length and number of leaves in the GU produced during the second flush, (3) consequently reduced the portion of stem produced during the entire growing season (the annual GU), and (4) increased the number of branches of the GU damaged during the first flush. In contrast, decapitation caused later production of the GU of the second flush and had apparently no effect on height growth components. In all treatments, the number of branches that developed on the GU produced during the first flush increased.

Accession: 003046564

DOI: 10.1139/x97-128

Download PDF Full Text: Artificial defoliation, decapitation of the terminal bud, and removal of the apical tip of the shoot in sessile oak seedlings and consequences on subsequent growth



Related references

Langstrom, B.; Hellqvist, C., 1989: Effects of defoliation, decapitation, and partial girdling on root and shoot growth of pine and spruce seedlings. One-year-old seedlings of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies were defoliated, decapitated, or girdled partially in order to simulate different types of insect damage. Immediate growth effects were evaluated in a growth chamber. Another set of seedli...

Kulman, H.M., 1965: Effects of artificial defoliation of pine on subsequent shoot and needle growth. Needles of Pinus resinosa Ait, trees in a 5-year-old plantation were severed at distal ends of fascicle sheaths to stimulate insect defoliation. In July 1959, needles of 1959, 1958, 1957, 1959 + 1958, 1959 + 1957, and 1958 + 1957 origin were remov...

Gupta, D.K.D., 1972: Developmental Physiology of sugar-beet. 3. Effects of decapitation, defoliation, and removing part of the root and shoot on subsequent growth of sugar-beet. In growth-chamber experiments, removal of the terminal bud at the 2-, 4-, 14- or 31-leaf stages or of 1-cm-long unfolding leaves produced after these stages had been reached, resulted in much greater growth of the remaining leaves and in a transie...

Das Gupta D.K., 1972: Developmental physiology of sugar beet d part 3 effects of decapitation defoliation and removing part of the root and shoot on subsequent growth of sugar beet d. Journal of Experimental Botany 23(74): 93-102

Mika A., 1971: Effect of apple shoot defoliation decapitation and ringing on their growth and fruit bud setting. Prace Instytutu Sadownictwa W Skierniewicach: 72

Macdonald, J.E.; Little, A.C.H., 2001: Spraying Pinus sylvestris L seedlings with GA3 during terminal bud development stimulates shoot apical meristem activity and cambial growth. Plant Biology (Rockville) : 80-81

MacDonald, J.E.; Little, C.H.Anthony., 2006: Foliar application of GA3 during terminal long-shoot bud development stimulates shoot apical meristem activity in Pinus sylvestris seedlings. The effect of exogenous gibberellin (GA3) on shoot apical meristem activity in conifer vegetative buds was investigated by spraying 0 or 0.1% GA3 on the foliage of first-year Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings twice weekly for 9 weeks duri...

Kathiravetpillai, A.; Kulasegaram, S., 1977: Artificial defoliation, decapitation and disbudding on growth and branching in young tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). In a trial with active or dormant 8-month-old plants, clones DT 1 and TRI 2025, the effects were compared of removing the terminal bud either alone or together with the young leaves (thumb-nailing) or the mature leaves, or the young leaves only, o...

Mcintyre G.; Damson E., 1988: Apical dominance in phaseolus vulgaris the triggering effect of shoot decapitation and leaf excision on growth of the lateral buds. It was postulated that the release of lateral buds from apical dominance is triggered by the immediate increase in apoplastic water potential (hydrostatic pressure) that is produced by shoot decapitation and that is rapidly transmitted throughout...

Tschaplinski, T.J.; Blake, T.J., 1994: Carbohydrate mobilization following shoot defoliation and decapitation in hybrid poplar. The effects of shoot defoliation, decapitation, and disbudding on carbon mobilization were investigated in rooted cuttings of Populus maximowiczii times nigra L. 'MN9'. Ten days after complete shoot defoliation or decapitation, the stem...