EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

How biotechnology regulation separates ethics from risk


Outlook on Agriculture 26(3): 145-150, Sept
How biotechnology regulation separates ethics from risk
In the public debate about agricultural biotechnology, an important source of dispute has been the industry's stated aim of further industrializing agriculture. Critics and proponents have argued their case using the language of risk, which entails an implicit ethics. in response, regulators have tended to separate 'risk' from 'ethics', and assign judgements about each to specialists. This administrative separation encourages public deference to expert assessment. By treating implicit value judgements as merely technical matters, such regulation serves to legitimize the biotechnology R&D priorities and marginalize any broader public debate. Thus the official scope of 'bioethics' is itself political.


Accession: 003162353



Related references

How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary. Agriculture and Human Values 14(1): 29-43, 1997

A long-term study of knowledge, risk and ethics for students enrolled in an introductory biotechnology course. Hortscience 36(3): 514, June, 2001

A long-term study of knowledge, risk, and ethics for students enrolled in an introductory biotechnology course. Journal of Animal Science 81(5): 1348-1353, 2003

Biotechnology, law and ethics: the new Norwegian Act on Medical Use of Biotechnology (Act No. 56 of 5 August 1994). European Journal of Health Law 3(2): 189-195, 1996

What really separates casuistry from principlism in biomedical ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35(3): 205-229, 2015

Safe biotechnology 9: values in risk assessment for the environmental application of microorganisms. The Safety in Biotechnology Working Party of the European Federation of Biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology 17(8): 307-311, 1999

How biotechnology regulation sets a risk. Agriculture and human values 14(1): 29-43, 1997

Risk, regulation and biotechnology: the case of GM crops. Gm Crops & Food 5(3): 170-177, 2015

Environmental risk disharmonies of European biotechnology regulation. AgBiotech News and Information 9(8): 179N-184N, 1997

Just who is at risk? The ethics of environmental regulation. Human & Experimental Toxicology 30(8): 795-819, 2011