EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Method for 14C-labeling maize field plots and assessment of label uniformity within plots






Communications in soil science and plant analysis0(11-12): 1759-1771

Method for 14C-labeling maize field plots and assessment of label uniformity within plots

There is increasing interest in use of isotopic tracers to study nutrient liberation and transformation in plant tissues and soils. We developed a technique for pulse-labeling plants in the field with (14)C. Spatial distribution of radioactivity was measured in plots of maize (Zea mays L.) plants exposed to (14)CO(2). Two clear polyvinyl chambers measuring 1 m wide x 2 m long x 1 m high were used to (14)C- label maize plants in conventional tillage and no-tillage treatments. A closed loop in-line with a pump allowed injection of (14)CO(2) and unlabeled CO(2), and subsampling through an infrared gas analyzer. Cooling and mixing of the air within the chambers was achieved through the use of a free-standing automobile radiator with fan placed in the center of each plot. The specific activities of leaf tips differed by an order of magnitude among maize plants within the plot. Tillage and time after labeling within the first 48 h had no significant effect on specific activity of maize plants. Plant activity significantly differed by row. The row closest to the inlet and along the edge of the chamber was significantly lower in several plots. Despite differences among leaf tip specific activities, total aboveground activity was uniform within the plot. Plant allometry and plant sampling immediately after labeling would help in correcting for within chamber variability in future field labeling studies.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 003199848



Related references

Pollution of experimental maize plots from fertilizers applied to adjacent plots. Revista brasileira de ciencia do solo 3(3): 190-193, 1979

Harvesting plots of seed production in cereals, leguminous plants and of hybrid plots of maize. Productia vegetala: 28 (6) 18-23, 1976

Evaluation of avermectin B1 (MK 936) against Heliothis spp. in the laboratory and in field plots and against the boll weevil in field plots. Southwestern Entomologist (Suppl. 7): 11-16, 1985

Gathering tree height data for forest modelling: permanent plots, temporary plots, interval plots. Centralblatt fur das Gesamte Forstwesen 116(1/2): 81-89, 1999

Manual of instructions on experiments, preservation plots, protected trees, statistical sample plots, linear increment plots, and the annual silvicultural report. 1951

Soil-analysis of field experimental plots, as an information of uniformity trial value. 1973

A quantitative method for the simultaneous assessment of take all of wheat in field plots and the isolation of the pathogen. Phytophylactica 21(2): 171-174, 1989

The use of nursery plots vs. field plots for varietal evaluation. Report of the Fifth Hard Red Winter Wheat Improvement Conference, Manhattan, Kansas, February 12, 13 and 14 1945. 15-16, 1945

Medium-term changes in soil condition on precise fertilizer trial plots of the Austrian Forest Research Institute. Part 2: Fertilized plots and comparison of fertilized and untreated plots. Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Bundesversuchsanstalt Wien ( 167/II): 109 pp., 1992

Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from maize field plots as affected by N fertilizer type and application method. Biology and fertility of soils 34(5): 297-303, 2001