EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
47,893,527
Abstracts:
28,296,643
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling


, : Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling. Journal of Hydrology Amsterdam 207(3/4): 147-169

Estimates of potential evaporation E(p) are commonly employed in terrestrial water balance and net primary productivity models. This study compared a set of 11 E(p) methods in a global-scale water balance model (WBM) applied to 3265 0.5 degree (lat. x long.) grid cells representing the conterminous US. The E(p) methods ranged from simple temperature-driven equations to physically-based combination approaches and include reference surface E(pr) and surface cover-dependent E(ps) algorithms. Cover-dependent parameters were assigned a priori based on grid cell vegetation. The WBM applies mean monthly climatic drivers and other biophysical inputs to compute water budgets on individual grid cells using a quasi-daily time step. For each E(p) method water budgets were computed and compared against mean monthly and annual streamflow from 679 gauged watersheds, assumed to be representative of the grid cells in which they reside. Procedures were developed for excluding watersheds for which this assumption was questionable, and 330 of the original 1009 watersheds were removed from further analysis. Among E(pr) methods, the range of mean bias relative to observed runoff, and thus simulated actual evapotranspiration E(s), varied from approximately -100 to +100 mm yr-1, E(ps) methods had a substantially smaller range, from about -50 to +50 mm yr-1. These results agree well with previous E(p) intercomparison studies at the point scale. Some individual methods from both the E(pr) and E(ps) groups yielded relatively small overall bias when compared with observed discharge data, suggesting the utility of simple as well as physically-based evaporation functions in continental- and global-scale applications. For any individual method, the spatial distribution of E(s) across the US was significantly altered relative to that of E(p) due to moisture-induced limits on soil drying. These limitations were most pronounced in hot, dry areas, where differences among E(p) methods in excess of 700 mm yr-1 were reduced to differences of less than 200 mm yr-1 in E(s) and runoff. There was a correspondingly higher sensitivity of E(s) to the choice of E(p) in more humid regions. These findings suggest that predictions made by macro-scale hydrology models like the WBM can be sensitive to the specific E(p) method applied and that this sensitivity results in bias relative to measured components of the terrestrial water cycle. The adoption of particular E(p) functions within such models should be conditioned upon the comparison of water budget calculations to suitable records of observed discharge.

Accession: 003237014

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00109-7

Download PDF Full Text: Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling


Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:
Close
Close

Related references

Wang Bing; Liu ShiRong; Cui XiangHui; Bai XiuLan, 2002: Advances in the research on water and heat balance laws of the global terrestrial ecosystem. The water and heat balance of terrestrial ecosystem are key points of studying the climate and micro-climate form and change mechanism, and it are important to keep the current ecosystems steady and recover the degraded ecosystems. In this paper,...

Prentice I.C.lin; Bondeau Alberte; Cramer Wolfgang; Harrison Sandy P.; Hickler Thomas; Lucht Wolfgang; Stich Stephen; Smith Ben; Sykes Martin T., 2007: Dynamic global vegetation modeling; quantifying terrestrial ecosystem responses to large-scale environmental change. Global Change - The IGBP Series 24: 175-192

Federer, C.; Vorosmarty, C.F.kete, B., 1996: Intercomparison of methods for calculating potential evaporation in regional and global water balance models. Five methods (Thornthwaite, Hamon, Jensen-Haise, Turc, and Penman) for estimating potential evaporation for a reference surface (PEr) were compared to four methods (Priestley-Taylor, McNaughton-Black, Penman-Monteith, and Shuttleworth-Wallace) for...

Barman, R.; Jain, A.K.; Liang, M., 2015: Climate-driven uncertainties in modeling terrestrial energy and water fluxes: a site-level to global-scale analysis. We used a land surface model constrained using data from flux tower sites, to analyze the biases in ecosystem energy and water fluxes arising due to the use of meteorological reanalysis datasets. Following site-level model calibration encompassing...

Anonymous, 1995: Terrestrial ecosystem interactions with global change. Papers submitted to the First Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Conference, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA, 23-27 May 1994. These conference papers mark the first meeting of the Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems (GCTE) Core Project of the IGBP and are presented in 3 major areas: elevated CO2 interactions, ecosystem physiology, and ecosystem structure and composi...

Melillo, J.M.; Borchers, J.; Chaney, J.; Fisher, H.; Fox, S.; Haxeltine, A.; Janetos, A.; Kicklighter, D.W.; Kittel, T.G.F.; Mcguire, A.D.; Mckeown, R.; Neilson, R.; Nemani, R.; Ojima, D.S.; Painter, T.; Pan, Y.; Parton, W.J.; Pierce, L.; Pitelka, L.; Prentice, C.; Rizzo, B.; Rosenbloom, N.A.; Running, S., 1995: Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO-2 doubling. We compare the simulations of three biogeography models (BIOME2, Dynamic Global Phytogeography Model (DOLY), and Mapped Atmosphere-Plant Soil System (MAPSS)) and three biogeochemistry models (BIOME-BGC (BioGeochemistry Cycles), CENTURY, and Terres...

Piara Singh; Vijaya, D.; Srinivas, K.; Wanim, S.P., 2002: Potential productivity, yield gap, and water balance of soybean-chickpea sequential system at selected benchmark sites in India. Global Theme 3: Water, Soil, and Agrobiodiversity Management for Ecosystem Health. Report no. 1. ICRISAT's intervention in the project Improving Management of Natural Resources for Sustainable Rainfed Agriculture funded by the Asian Development Bank aims to increase the productivity and sustainability of the medium and high water-holding...

McVicar, T.R.; Roderick, M.L.; Donohue, R.J.; Li, L.T.o; Van Niel, T.G.; Thomas, A.; Grieser, J.; Jhajharia, D.; Himri, Y.; Mahowald, N.M.; Mescherskaya, A.; V.; Kruger, A.C.; Rehman, S.; Dinpashoh, Y., 2012: Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds; implications for evaporation. In a globally warming climate, observed rates of atmospheric evaporative demand have declined over recent decades. Several recent studies have shown that declining rates of evaporative demand are primarily governed by trends in the aerodynamic com...

Kucharik, C.J.; Foley, J.A.; Delire, C.; Fisher, V.A.; Coe, M.T.; Lenters, J.D.; Young Molling, C.; Navin Ramankutty; Norman, J.M.; Gower, S.T., 2000: Testing the performance of a Dynamic Global Ecosystem Model: water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. While a new class of Dynamic Global Ecosystem Models (DGEMs) has emerged in the past few years as an important tool for describing global biogeochemical cycles and atmosphere-biosphere interactions, these models are still largely untested. Here, w...

Friend, A.; White, A., 2000: Evaluation and analysis of a dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model under preindustrial conditions at the global scale. Global biogeochemical cycles 14(4): 1173-1190