+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Reconstruction and analysis of historical changes in carbon storage in arctic tundra

Reconstruction and analysis of historical changes in carbon storage in arctic tundra

Ecology (Washington D C) 78(4): 1188-1198

Surface air temperature in arctic regions has increased since pre-industrial times, raising concerns that warmer and possibly drier conditions have increased soil decomposition rates, thereby stimulating the release to the atmosphere of the large stores of carbon (C) in arctic soils. We used a model (MBL-GEM, Marine Biological Laboratory General Ecosystem Model) of ecosystem C and nitrogen (N) dynamics to predict and analyze historical (1829-1990) changes in C storage in a N-limited, tussock-tundra ecosystem near Toolik Lake on the North Slope of Alaska. The model simulates stand-level photosynthesis and N uptake by plants, allocation of C and N to foliage, stems, and fine roots, respiration in these tissues, turnover of biomass through litterfall, and decomposition of litter and soil organic matter. We first calibrated the model by deriving a single parameter set that closely simulated the response of tussock tundra to decade-long experimental manipulations of nutrients, temperature, light, and atmospheric CO-2. The calibrated model predicts that historical increases in temperature and atmospheric CO-2 have increased total ecosystem C storage. Higher temperatures increased soil and plant respiration, but those losses of C were overcompensated by increased photosynthesis resulting from redistribution of N from soil to plants. This redistribution of N was due to increased net mineralization and uptake of N. Increases in atmospheric CO-2 also increased photosynthesis, but consequent increases in C storage were constrained by limits on increases in the C:N ratio of vegetation. In contrast, hypothesized historical decreases in soil moisture substantially decreased simulated total ecosystem C storage as a result of large increases in soil respiration. With decreased soil moisture, increases in photosynthesis associated with redistribution of N from soil to plants only partially compensated for respiratory C losses, as plant uptake of N could not keep pace with increased N mineralization rates. Consequent losses of N from the ecosystem contributed to the declines in C storage under drier conditions. Based on the combined effects of reconstructed historical changes in atmospheric CO-2, mean growing-season temperature, and two alternative soil moisture scenarios, the model predicts a -5.4 to +2.3% change in ecosystem C from 1829 to 1990. These estimates are consistent with field evidence that historically recent changes in C storage of tussock tundra have been relatively small. However, the model also predicts that relatively large transient losses of ecosystem C (50-180 g cntdot m-2 cntdot yr-1) may frequently have occurred since the late 1800s, with one of the largest simulated C losses of the 20th century occurring from 1988 to 1990 (3-yr average = 133 g C cntdot m-2 cntdot yr-1). These simulated losses were similar to losses C cntdot m-2 cntdot yr-1) but nonetheless suggest that these measured losses may be transitory in nature.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003251721

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/2265868

Related references

Effects of historical changes in climate on carbon storage in Alaskan arctic tundra. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 75(2 PART 2): 148, 1994

Modelling carbon responses of tundra ecosystems to historical and projected climate: sensitivity of pan-Arctic carbon storage to temporal and spatial variation in climate. Global Change Biology, Supplement 6(Supplement 1): 141-159, 2000

Analysis of CO2, temperature, and moisture effects on carbon storage in Alaskan arctic tundra using a general ecosystem model. Global change and arctic terrestrial ecosystems 451, 1997

Carbon storage and distribution in tundra soils of Arctic Alaska, U.S.A. Arctic & Alpine Research 28(4): 414-424, 1996

Predicting Carbon Storage in Tundra Soils of Arctic Alaska. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67(3): 8-50, 2003

Soil organic carbon storage and distribution in arctic tundra, Barrow, Alaska. Soil Science Society of America journal 63(4): 934-940, 1999

Carbon dioxide flux from three Arctic tundra types in north-central Alaska, U.S.A. Tussock tundra, shrub tundra, lichen-hath, Salix pulchra, Betula nana, Vaccinium uliginosum, Ledum palustre, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Empetrum nigrum, Carex, Eriophorum vaginatum, Dicranum, Sphagnum. Arctic and alpine research 14(1): 27-32, 1982

Comparative genomic and physiological analysis provides insights into the role of Acidobacteria in organic carbon utilization in Arctic tundra soils. Fems Microbiology Ecology 82(2): 341-355, 2013

To further estimation of carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of tundra and forest tundra biomes of Russian North Phytomass and primary productivity. Doklady Akademii Nauk 335(4): 530-532, 1994

Arctic development and historical analysis: the use of historical methodology in addressing current issues in the Arctic. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 67(2-3): 213-225, 2008

Research on arctic tundra environments the influence of grazing on arctic tundra ecosystems. Arctic Bulletin 2(9): 153-160, 1976

The organic carbon budget of a shallow Arctic tundra lake on the Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula, N.W.T., Canada: Arctic lake carbon budget. Biogeochemistry (Dordrecht) 24(3): 145-172, 1994

Influence of water table and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on the carbon balance of arctic tundra. Arctic & Alpine Research 16(3): 331-336, 1984

Reconstruction of historical patterns of sequestration using a general model of ecosystem and carbon and nitrogen dynamics analysis of carbon differences among north american ecosystems. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 72(2 SUPPL): 188, 1991

Permafrost melting and the age of carbon respired from arctic tundra. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 85(47, Suppl, 2004