+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Regional economic benefits of environmental management at the US Department of Energy's major nuclear weapons sites



Regional economic benefits of environmental management at the US Department of Energy's major nuclear weapons sites



Journal of Environmental Management 54(1): 23-37



The five major US Department of Energy nuclear weapons sites located in the states of Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, Tennessee and Washington have changed functions. Environmental management of 50 years of on-site contamination is now the primary function of the sites. The cost of this cleanup is estimated at over dollar sign200 billion. A regional economic simulation model was built to estimate the economic impact of changing environmental management expenditures on the surrounding regional economies. These simulations show wide variability among the host regions in dependence on the DOE site and differences in the likelihood of producing jobs and adding to personal income from environmental management investments at the sites. Urban regions, such as Oak Ridge, are more able to convert environmental management dollars into local jobs and income than rural regions, such as the Idaho National Environmental Engineering Laboratory.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003253185

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1006/jema.1998.0216


Related references

Long-term stewardship of the environmental legacy at restored sites within the Department of Energy nuclear weapons complex. Health Physics 85(5): 578-584, 2003

Economic impact of accelerated cleanup on regions surrounding the U.S. DOE's major nuclear weapons sites. Risk Analysis 19(4): 635-647, 1999

A review of environmental radiological data from usa department of energy nuclear sites. Health Physics 56(Suppl. 1): S68, 1989

Occupational health services at ten U.S. Department of Energy weapons sites. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 43(4): 418-428, 2003

Department of Energy. Nuclear weapons milestone triggers U.S. policy debate. Science 317(5836): 304-305, 2007

Department of Energy report details lower cost estimates for cleaning up U.S. nuclear weapons mess. GSA Today: Pages 15. 1997., 1997

A Regional assessment of the economic and environmental benefits of an irrigation scheduling service. 1980

Environmental monitoring at two Department of Energy sites. Dwyer, F J, Doane, T R, Hinman, M L ASTM STP; Environmental toxicology and risk assessment: Modeling and risk assessment (Sixth Volume): 101-116, 1997

Citizen board issues and local newspaper coverage of risk, remediation, and environmental management: Six U.S. nuclear weapons facilities. Remediation Journal 18(3): 79-90, 2008

Doubt Cast on Laser Weapons: An American Physical Society report says major technical advances and at least another decade of research will be required to determine whether directed energy weapons will work. Science 236(4801): 509-510, 1987

Ecological assessment of US Department of Energy environmental restoration sites. McKenzie, D H, Hyatt, D E, McDonald, V J Ecological indicators, Vols 1 and 2: 2) 1219-1238, 1992

Beryllium disease among construction trade workers at Department of Energy nuclear sites. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 56(10): 1125-1136, 2014

Maximizing the environmental benefits per dollar expended: an economic interpretation and review of agricultural environmental benefits and costs. Society and natural resources 12(6): 571-598, 1999

Economic analysis of environmental benefits of integrated pest management. Journal of agricultural and applied economics 29(2): 243-253, 1997