EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Some relationships between silvicultural treatments and symmetry of stem growth in a red pine stand


Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 15(2): 90-93, June
Some relationships between silvicultural treatments and symmetry of stem growth in a red pine stand
Variations in spacing and the distribution of removed trees have been assumed to affect the pattern of growth on tree boles. Changing crown shapes were believed to affect the symmetry of the stems. This study examined the change of growing space resulting from differential species growth in a mixed stand. A red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) plantation in southern New Hampshire was planted at 2 X 2 m spacing in 1917. At one end of the stand every second row was planted with white pine (Pinus strobus L.), whereas the other end of the stand was pure red pine. In the mixed portion of the stand, the red pine outgrew the white pine, overtopping and often killing it. The mixed stand was thinned in the 1970s and the pure stand in the 1980s for a variety of products which opened more crown room for some of the trees. We compared growth increments along perpendicular axes to determine if asymmetry was consistent at different bole heights. The study did not show asymmetric boles at age 50 and did not have asymmetric growth patterns attributable to the earlier history up to stand age 70. When current crown shape was compared to current growth there was no relationship between asymmetric crowns and asymmetric growth. Provided the asymmetry is not maintained throughout the entire rotation, silvicultural treatments which greatly affect the stand spatial pattern may not have a lasting effect on the symmetry of the boles.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 003276606



Related references

Link between southern pine silvicultural treatments and stand value. General Technical Report Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service ( FPL-GTR-100): 37-45, 1997

Silvicultural treatments for converting loblolly pine to longleaf pine dominan Effects on resource availability and their relationships with planted longleaf pine seedlings. 2012

Competing vegetation and pine growth response to silvicultural treatments in a six-year-old Piedmont loblolly pine plantation. Southern journal of applied forestry 15(3): 138-144, 1991

Effects of intermediate silvicultural treatments on the distribution of within-stand growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24(2): 398-404, 1994

Silvicultural implications of the growth response of naturally regenerated even-aged stands of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris mill.) to varying stand age, site quality, and density and certain stand structure measures. 1978

Modeling stand level growth and yield response to silvicultural treatments. Forest Science 41(3): 629-638, 1995

Growth and regeneration response to various stand treatments in a mature Lodgepole Pine stand. Information Report, Northern Forest Research Centre, Canada (N. NOR-X-137): 22, 1975

Stand development and growth responses of 1-and 3-year-old natural upland hardwoods to silvicultural treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 232(1-3): 124-134, 2006

Adjusting slash pine growth and yield for silvicultural treatments. General Technical Report Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service (SRS-92): 328-332, 2006

Growth and wood properties of longleaf pine following silvicultural treatments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41(5): 989-992, 1977