EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Sorghum intercropping effects on yield, morphology, and quality of forage soybean



Sorghum intercropping effects on yield, morphology, and quality of forage soybean



Crop science 39(5): 1380-1384



Shading patterns when two forage species are intercropped may be different than in a monocrop environment. Our objectives were to quantify yield and forage quality response of forage soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] intercropped with forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and compare to the measurements of monocrop soybean. Soybean plants were harvested from the middle portion of individual rows in plots containing only soybean and from plots having alternating soybean and sorghum rows spaced 76 cm apart. Morphological and forage quality measurements were determined on leaf and stem fractions. Morphological measurements included main stem length, node number, leaf area ratio (LAR), specific leaf weight (SLW), and stem diameter. Forage quality constituents included in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), hemicellulose, and cellulose, and crude protein (CP) concentrations. Intercropped soybean had 6 more plants m(-1) of row, less advanced morphological development, and 2.3 Mg ha(-1) less dry matter than monocrop soybean. Leaf IVDMD, NDF, hemicellulose, and cellulose did not differ between intercrop and monocrop soybean. However, stem IVDMD was 33 g kg(-1) greater for intercropped than monocrop soybean, reflecting the 36 g kg(-1) decrease in NDF concentration. Intercropped soybean was lodged both years more than monocrop soybean, which may have been due to the significant decrease in stem NDF. Leaf CP concentration was 25 g kg(-1) greater for monocrop soybean than intercropped soybean; however, stems from intercropped soybean had 12 g kg(-1) greater CP than monocrop soybean stems. Soybean exhibited a high degree of morphological plasticity, presumably in response to increased competition for solar radiation. Although forage quality of intercrop soybean was greater than monocrop soybean, intercropping forage-type soybean with another tall-growing forage does not appear to be practical because of the decrease in dry matter accumulation.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 003276798

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Sorghum-soybean intercropping. VIII. Cutting systems, soybean cultivars and sorghum hybrids in the forage yield of the cultures intercropped between rows and sorghum monoculture. Revista Brasileira de Agrociencia 10(4): 475-481, 2004

Sorghum-soybean intercropping. IX. Cutting systems on forage sorghum yield and soybean cultivars intercropped within the line and monoculture of sorghum. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 27(2): 451-461, 2003

Effect of intercropping of legumes on forage yield and quality of forage sweet sorghum. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 14(4): 905-909, 2001

Intercropping and population density effects on yield component, seed quality and photosynthesis of sorghum and soybean. Journal of Food Technology in Africa 6(3): 96-100, 2001

Sorghum-soybean intercropping. XII. Soybean cultivars intercropped with sorghum hybrids between rows to obtain forage under two cutting systems. Revista Ceres 52(299): 59-71, 2005

Sorghum - soybean intercropping. VI. Evaluation in function of regrowth of cultivars of sorghum and soybean intercropped in the between rows and monoculture in forage production. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 24(Ed. Especial): 215-223, 2000

Effect of intercropping forage sorghum and cotton on forage yield of sorghum and yield, yield components and fiber properties of Giza 75, cotton variety. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor 32(1): 181-191, 1994

Sorghum and soybean intercropping. VII. Systems of cutting for increasing forage of intercropped sorghum-soybean. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 27(3): 681-688, 2003

Sorghum-soybean intercropping x hybrids of sorghum and soybean cultivars for forage production. Revista Brasileira de Agrociencia 10(2): 179-184, 2004

Strip intercropping effects on yield and yield components of corn, grain sorghum, and soybean. Agronomy Journal 91(5): 807-813, 1999

Effect of intercropping patterns of forage cowpeas with two types of grain sorghum on growth, yield and quality. Desert development Part 1: desert agriculture, ecology and biology: Proceedings of the Second International Desert Development Conference held on 25-31 January 1987 in Cairo, Egypt: 407-421, 1991

Maize soybean intercropping effect of different variety and sowing density of the legume on forage yield and silage quality. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 168(5): 354-360, 1992

Nitrogen fertilizer effects on yield and nitrogen uptake of sorghum sorghum bicolor and soybean glycine max grown in sole cropping and intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 12(3): 233-240, 1985

Effect of graded doses of N and forage sorghum cultivars on the yield and quality of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Annals of Biology Ludhiana 16(1): 71-74, 2000

Comparative effects of the sorghum bmr-6 and bmr-12 genes. I. Forage sorghum yield and quality. Crop science 45(6): 2234-2239, 2005