+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Surface roughness changes as affected by rainfall erosivity, tillage, and canopy cover

Surface roughness changes as affected by rainfall erosivity, tillage, and canopy cover

Soil Science Society of America Journal 61(6): 1746-1755

Surface roughness and canopy cover are important factors in preventing soil erosion. There is limited information on how soil surface roughness changes as a function of natural rainfall erosivity and canopy cover by plants. We hypothesized that canopy cover, tillage systems, and cumulative rainfall erosivity (CRE) would have unique effects on roughness. We tested this hypothesis on a Miami silt loam soil (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalf) using a portable laser microtopographer. Tillage treatments of conventional (moldboard plowing + disking), chisel plowing, and chisel plowing + dragging a chain produced three initial roughness levels. Surface cover was none (fallow) or soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Random roughness (RR), standard deviation (SD), tortuosity (T), and fractal roughness functions, expressed by the fractal index (D) and the crossover length (1), were calculated from microtopography data. Chisel tillage had the greatest initial values of surface roughness, followed by chisel + chain and conventional tillage, as measured by the l index. All indices but D generally decreased with CRE. The RR and SD indices decreased quadratically with CRE, with decreases of 38 and 36%, respectively, from initial values after 200 units of CRE, while the T and l indices decreased exponentially with decreases of 40 and 60%, respectively, from initial values after 200 units of CRE. Soybean cover lowered soil surface roughness 7% less than fallow, as measured by the l index. The l index was 50, 71, and 205% more sensitive to changes in CRE than RR, SD, and T indices, respectively. The fractal roughness functions, with D and l indices calculated, were the best approaches to characterize surface roughness at small scales, such as existing plant rows, mainly due to l index sensitivity to changes in CRE.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003289691

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100060028x

Related references

Surface roughness changes as affected by tillage and rainfall erosivity. 1993

Soil surface roughness formed by chiseling and affected by rainfall erosivity. 2008

Soil surface roughness after tillage and rainfall. Proceedings of the International Symposium on River Sedimentation 4: 166-175, 1989

Effects of tillage and rainfall on soil surface roughness and properties. Soil Technology 7(1): 93-103, 1994

Alterations in soil surface roughness by tillage and rainfall in relation to water erosion. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo 30(2): 339-352, 2006

Surface roughness of an iceptisol related with soil tillage and compaction under natural rainfall. 2012

Preliminary evaluation of the SIR-B response to soil moisture, surface roughness, and crop canopy cover. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing GE-24(4): 517-526, 1986

Effect of rainfall on the roughness of the soil surface and infiltration of water in soils under two tillage systems. Agricultura Tecnica en Mexico 22(1): 3-19, 1996

Plow-layer porosity and surface roughness from tillage as affected by initial porosity and soil moisture at tillage time. Soil Sci Soc Amer Proc 31(4): 551-556, 1967

Rainfall runoff and erosion in Napa valley vineyards: effects of slope, cover and surface roughness. Hydrological Processes 14(7): 1289-1304, 2000

Runoff from a cornfield as affected by tillage and corn canopy: a large-scale simulated-rainfall hydrologic data set for model testing. Water Resources Research 35(9): 2881-2885, 1999

Hydraulic conductivity, residue cover and soil surface roughness under different tillage systems in semiarid conditions. Soil and Tillage Research 85(1/2): 13-26, 2006

Erosion as affected by tillage-induced roughness and surface mulch in a soil with a simulated subsurface pan. Transactions of the ASAE 45(1): 83-87, 2002

Damage by greenbug homoptera aphididae to grain sorghum as affected by tillage surface residues and canopy. Journal of Economic Entomology 80(4): 792-798, 1987

Testing roughness indices to estimate soil surface roughness changes due to simulated rainfall. Soil & Tillage Research 17(1-2): 87-100, 1990