+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Towards a method for the economic evaluation of environmental indicators for UK integrated arable farming systems



Towards a method for the economic evaluation of environmental indicators for UK integrated arable farming systems



Agriculture ecosystems and environment 72(2): 145-158



Integrated arable farming systems (IAFS), which involve a reduction in the use of off-farm inputs, are attracting considerable research interest in the UK. The objectives of these systems' experiments are to compare their financial performance with that from conventional or current farming practices. To date, this comparison has taken little account of any environmental benefits (or dis-benefits) of the two systems. The objective of this paper is to review the assessment methodologies available for the analysis of environmental impacts. To illustrate the results of this exercise, the methodology and environmental indicators chosen are then applied to data from one of the LINK-Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) experimental sites. Data from the Pathhead site in southern Scotland are used to evaluate the use of invertebrates and nitrate loss as environmental indicators within IAFS. The results suggest that between 1992 and 1995 the biomass of earthworms fell by 278 kg ha-1 on the integrated rotation and rose by 308 kg ha-1 on the conventional system. This led to environmental costs ranging between 22.24 pounds and 133.44 pounds per hectare for the integrated system and gains of between 24.64 pounds and 147.84 pounds for the conventional system. In terms of nitrate, the integrated system had an estimated loss of 72.21 pounds per hectare in comparison to 149.40 pounds per hectare on the conventional system. Conclusions are drawn about the advantages and disadvantages of this type of analytical framework.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003320559

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809(98)00171-6


Related references

Carabids as indicators within temperate arable farming systems implications from SCARAB and LINK integrated farming systems projects. Unknown, 2002

LINK Integrated Farming Systems (a field-scale comparison of arable rotations). Volume II: The economic evaluation of input decisions. HGCA Project Report ( 173): 141 pp., 2000

Evaluation of farming systems according to valuation indices developed within a European network on integrated and ecological arable farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy 21(1): 53-67, 2004

Less-intensive integrated farming systems for arable crop production and environmental protection. Proceedings Fertiliser Society ( 346): 32 pp., 1993

The development of integrated arable production systems to meet potential economic and environmental requirements. Outlook on Agriculture 27(3): 145-151, 1998

Evaluation and testing of Integrated Arable Farming Systems on innovative pilot farms in the Netherlands. Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Pests and Diseases 1998: Volume 3: Proceedings of an International Conference, Brighton, UK, 16-19 November 1998: 1115-1124, 1998

Arable acronyms analysed: A review of integrated arable farming systems research in western Europe. Annals of Applied Biology 125(2): 399-438, 1994

Measuring the unmeasurable? A method to quantify adoption of integrated pest management practices in temperate arable farming systems. Pest Management Science 75(12): 3144-3152, 2019

Integrated economic and environmental assessment of Missouri MSEA farming systems. Agricultural research to protect water quality: proceedings of the conference February 21-24-1993 Minneapolis Minnesota USA 334, 1993

Less-intensive farming and the environment An integrated farming systems approach for UK arable crop production. Glen, D M , Greaves, M P , Anderson, H H Ecology and integrated farming systems 307-318, 1995

Cost benefit investigation - plant protection in arable farming. Approaches to integrated plant protection in arable farming. An attempted evaluation from the point of view of the individual farm and the economy in general. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministers fur Ernahrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, A, Angewandte Wissenschaft (303): 269, 1984

Nutrient utilization and losses in arable crops: evaluation of on-farm data from innovation farms in 1990 and 1991. Component study for the project 'Introduction of integrated arable farming'. Verslag CABO DLO ( 187): 54 pp., 1993

Comparison of farming systems. Are integrated production and organic farming economic alternatives to conventional farming?. FAT Berichte, Switzerland ( 498): 13 pp., 1997

Integrated arable farming: especially lower environmental impact. PPO Bulletin Akkerbouw (1): 22-25, 2001

Farming systems research in the Netherlands: perspectives for integrated arable and organic mixed systems. Monograph British Crop Protection Council: 5) 139-146, 1990