EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Distinctive electrophoretic isoenzyme profiles in Saccharomyces sensu stricto



Distinctive electrophoretic isoenzyme profiles in Saccharomyces sensu stricto



International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 49 Pt 4: 1907-1913



Genetic variation among 35 strains representing the four currently recognized species of Saccharomyces s.s. (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. bayanus, S. pastorianus/carlsbergensis and S. paradoxus) was estimated by analysing the electrophoretic mobilities of nonspecific esterases, acid phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isoenzymes. 22 electrophoretic types were identified, a result in agreement with the phenotypic and genetic polymorphisms reported for this group of yeasts. However, the 4 species were clearly distinguishable based on the patterns obtained using 3 of the enzymes assayed, the resolving power not being improved by the introduction of data correspondent to lactate dehydrogenase. The overall diversity was higher among S. cerevisiae isolates, in contrast with S. paradoxus which showed only 2 patterns, one of which was common to 4 of the 5 strains studied. Concordant results from the application of the method and DNA hybridization experiments demonstrate its value for identification purposes.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 003408813

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10555375

DOI: 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1907



Related references

Electrophoretic karyotypes of authentic strains of the sensu stricto group of the genus Saccharomyces. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 44(4): 791-797, 1994

Electrophoretic karyotype analysis of the type-strains of the species belonging to Saccharomyces sensu stricto. Annali della Facolta di Agraria Universita degli Studi di Perugia 44PART 1 (0): 77-83, 1990, 1993

An opportunity to distinguish species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto by electrophoretic separation of the larger chromosomes. Letters in Applied Microbiology 23(4): 227-230, 1996

Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces mikatae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50 Pt 5: 1931-1942, 2000

Immunochemical studies on mannans of the genus Saccharomyces. Group of Saccharomyces sensu stricto species. Folia Microbiologica 19(2): 94-101, 1974

A novel specific DNA marker in Saccharomyces bayanus for species identification of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Journal of Microbiological Methods 75(3): 531-534, 2008

Genotypic study of Saccharomyces boulardii compared to the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex species. Journal de Mycologie Medicale 11(1): 19-25, 2001

Saccharomyces uvarum, a distinct group within Saccharomyces sensu stricto. FEMS microbiology letters 177(1): 177-185, 1999

Saccharomyces uvarum, a proper species within Saccharomyces sensu stricto. FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 192(2): 191-196, 2000

Saccharomyces paradoxus comb. nov., a newly separated species of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex based upon nDNA. Systematic and applied microbiology 12(2): 179-182, 1989

Quantitative real time PCR assays for the enumeration of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex in human feces. Journal of Microbiological Methods 71(3): 191-201, 2007

Baetis Leach 1815, sensu stricto or sensu lato A contribution to the genus concept based on species groups with identification keys Baetis Leach 1815, sensu stricto or sensu lato Ein Beitrag zum Gattungskonzept auf der Grundlage von Artengruppen mit Bestimmungsschluesseln. Lauterbornia. 20 April; 47: 59-129, 2003