Forestry policy reform and the role of incentives in Tanzania
Petersen, L.; Sandhovel, A.
Forest Policy and Economics 2(1): 39-55
2001
ISSN/ISBN: 1389-9341 DOI: 10.1016/s1389-9341(00)00037-x
Accession: 003450572
The Government of Tanzania is addressing ongoing degradation problems with a new forest policy that reflects changes in the national and international policy environment for forest management.
PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90
Related References
Bernecker, A.; Boyer, P.C.; Gathmann, C. 2021: The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the US Welfare Reform American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13(2): 26-57Aguilar-Støen, M 2018: Social forestry movements and science-policy networks: The politics of the forestry incentives program in Guatemala Geoforum 90: 20-26
Berube, Y. 1978: Forestry policy: government policy regarding the role of forestry cooperatives in the management and rational cultivation of forests Ensemble 25(5): 1-4
Kiondo, A.S.Z. 1999: Structural adjustment and land reform policy in Tanzania: a political interpretation of the 1992 National Agricultural Policy Agrarian economy: state and society in contemporary Tanzania: 42-56
Jayet, P.A.; Birfet, A.; Hofstetter, A. 1998: Agro-forestry and the Common Agricultural Policy: an investigation of incentives to afforestation Cahiers d' Economie et Sociologie Rurales 48: 5-35
Rosner, M.; Barrows, R. 1977: School finance reform and rural land use policy incentives Land economics: 53(3) 288-297
Heumann, M.; Church, T.W. 1990: Criminal Justice Reform, Monetary Incentives, and Policy Evaluation Law-Policy 12(1): 81-102
Conti, R.M.; Rosenthal, M.B. 2016: Pharmaceutical Policy Reform--Balancing Affordability with Incentives for Innovation New England Journal of Medicine 374(8): 703-706
O'Donnell, A.; Cummins, M.; Byrne, K.A. 2013: Forestry in the Republic of Ireland Government policy, grant incentives and carbon sequestration value Land Use Policy 35
Kleemeier, L. 1989: Policy reform and rural development in Tanzania Public Administration and Development 9(4): 405-416
Crabtree, J.R. 1995: Agricultural policy reform and farm forestry Forestry, agriculture and the environment: 55-79
Booth, D. 1991: Timing and sequencing in agricultural policy reform: Tanzania Development Policy Review 9(4): 353-379
Kleemeier, L. 1989: Policy reform and rural development assistance in Tanzania Public Administration and Development 9(4): 405-416
Schuh, G.E. 1985: Incentives needed to achieve food production goals: some thoughts on agricultural policy reform Proceedings of the Philadelphia society for promoting agriculture: 4-72
Oliver Morrissey 1995: Political commitment, institutional capacity and tax policy reform in Tanzania World Development 23(4): 637-649
Mather, A.S. 1994: Policy reform and institutional restructuring: the case of the Forestry Commission Progress in rural policy and planning 4: 69-78
Anonymous 1980: FAO/SIDA/CIDIAT study tours on incentives for community integration in rural development in Latin America in forestry and conservation programmes, Honduras, Jamaica, Colombia and Venezuela, 2-23 March 1980. Incentives for social integration in forestry and conservation programmes Viaje de estudio FAO/SIDA/CIDIAT sobre incentivos para la integracion en el desarrollo rural de America Latina de la comunidad en programas forestales y de conservacion, Honduras, Jamaica, Colombia y Venezuela, 2-23 de marzo de 1980 Incentivos para la integracion de la comunidad en programas forestales y de conservacion: 50
Gautier, L 2014: Policy reform of emission taxes and environmental research and development incentives in an international Cournot model with product differentiation Environment and Development Economics 19(04): 440-465
Sears, R.R.; Cronkleton, P.; Polo Villanueva, F.; Miranda Ruiz, M.; Pérez-Ojeda del Arco, M. 2018: Farm-forestry in the Peruvian Amazon and the feasibility of its regulation through forest policy reform Forest Policy and Economics 87: 49-58
Lewark, S. 1983: The reform of forestry studies according to the recommendations of the Lower Saxony commission for the reform of agriculture, forestry, and food science studies Forstarchiv 54(5): 190-194