EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single-cross performance



Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single-cross performance



Crop science 39(5): 1277-1282



Predicting the performance of untested single crosses is important in hybrid breeding programs. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of best linear unbiased prediction based on trait data alone (T-BLUP) and trait and marker data combined (TM-BLUP). The simulation procedure involved creating founder and recombinant inbreds in each of two heterotic groups, determining genetic and phenotypic values of 3025 single crosses, randomly partitioning the single crosses into 500 tested and 2525 untested hybrids, and calculating the correlation between the true and predicted performance of untested single crosses. The T-BLUP correlations ranged from 0.74 to 0.84, with n = 10, 50, or 100 quantitative trait loci (QTL) and trait heritability of 0.4 or 0.6. The advantage of TM-BLUP over T-BLUP decreased as n increased. With n = 50 or 100, the TM-BLUP correlations exceeded the T-BLUP correlations by 0.00 to 0.03, even when all QTL were tightly linked to flanking markers. The usefulness of TM-BLUP is doubtful, not only for predicting single-cross performance, but also for predicting breeding values of individuals within populations. The TM-BLUP procedure is useful when few QTL control a trait, or when genetic gain is sought only at a limited subset of QTL.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 003494894

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Science 36(1): 50-56, 1996

Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance given erroneous inbred relationships. Crop Science 36(4): 862-866, 1996

Testcross additive and dominance effects in best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 93(7): 1098-1102, 1996

Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution (Paris) 21(4): 467-478, 1989

Prediction of maize double-cross hybrids using the best linear unbiased prediction with microsatellite marker information. Genetics and Molecular Research 10(1): 25-35, 2011

Reduced animal model for marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution (Paris) 23(3): 221-234, 1991

Prediction of hybrid performance in rice: comparisons among best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) procedure, midparent value, and molecular marker distance. International Rice Research Notes 25(3): 12-13, 2000

Prediction of maize single-cross performance by mixed linear models with microsatellite marker information. Genetics and Molecular Research 9(2): 1054-1068, 2010

Backsolving in combined-merit models for marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of total additive genetic merit. Genetics Selection Evolution (Paris) 29(6): 611-616, 1997

Best linear unbiased prediction of additive genetic merit using a combined-merit sire and dam model for marker-assisted selection. Genes & Genetic Systems 73(1): 65-69, 1998

Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 120(2): 415-427, 2010

Genetic evaluation by best linear unbiased prediction using marker and trait information in a multibreed population. Genetics 148(1): 507-515, 1998

Best linear unbiased prediction of triticale hybrid performance. Euphytica 191(2): 223-230, 2013

Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91(11): 4344-4354, 2008

Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix. Plos One 5(9): -, 2011