+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Survival and early development of lodgepole pine



Survival and early development of lodgepole pine



Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15(4): 410-423



The effect of site fertility, spacing and mode of regeneration on the survival and stand development of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia, direct sown or planted), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies), both planted, was studied in a series of experiments at 22 study areas all over Finland. Sites were ranked as S1 (rich), S2 (damp), S3 (subdry), S4 (dry) and S5 (peatland).

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003574581

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1080/028275800750172619


Related references

The influence of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) provenance on the development and survival of larvae of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 87(1): 75-80, 1997

Effect of forage seeding on early growth and survival of lodgepole pine. Journal of range management 47(5): 379-384, 1994

Tolerance of tree roots to waterlogging. I. Survival of Sitka spruce and Lodgepole pine. II. Adaptation of Sitka spruce and Lodgepole pine to waterlogged soil. New Phytologist 80(1): 63-69; 71-77, 1978

Growth response in a douglas fir lodgepole pine stand after thinning of lodgepole pine by the mountain pine beetle a case study. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 87: 16-21, 1990

Lodgepole pine development after early spacing in the Blue Mountains of Oregon. U S Forest Service Research Paper PNW 1998(503): 1-24, 1998

Early survival and height growth of Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine seedlings and variations in site factors following treatment of logging residues. Research paper PNW RP US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station: 992 (451), 1992

Mountain pine beetle associated blue-stain fungi cause lesions on jack pine, lodgepole pine, and lodgepole x jack pine hybrids in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 85(3): 307-315, 2007

Early symptom development in lodgepole pine seedlings infected with endocronartium harknessii. Canadian Journal of Botany 68(2): 270-277, 1990

Early stand development of lodgepole pine spaced at age 7 in west-central Alberta. Information Report Northwest Region, Forestry Canada ( NOR-X-322): vi + 12 pp., 1991

Establishment and survival of European Pine shoot moth on container-grown 1-0 Lodgepole Pine. Information Report, Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canada (BC-X-79): 8, 1973

The growth and survival of Panolis flammea larvae in the absence of predators on Scots pine and lodgepole pine. Ecological Entomology 142: 225-234, 1989

Solar treatments for reducing survival of mountain pine beetle in infested ponderosa and lodgepole pine logs. 2001

The lodgepole killer--how bad is the mountain pine beetle? That depends on how badly the world needs lodgepole pine Pinus contorta, Dendroctonus ponderosae. Journal of forestry 81(5): 289-292, 1983

Effect of site preparation on survival, growth and root/shoot ratio in young stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and lodgepole pine. Rapport, Institutionen for Skogsskotsel, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (15): 30, 1985

Conversion of dense lodgepole pine stands in west central british columbia into young lodgepole pine plantations using prescribed fire 1. biomass consumption during burning treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22(4): 572-581, 1992