+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips



Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips



Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2): 183-191



A case study of whale watching off the Californian coast (USA, 1993) was used to investigate: the extent of difference in consumer surplus per day by including varying degrees of multi-destination visitors when estimating a negative binomial count data travel cost method (TCM); whether the difference between consumer surplus for primary purpose trips and consumer surplus for all trip purposes is statistically significant by comparing confidence intervals of the estimates; whether the consumer surplus from incorporating multi-destination visitors in the TCM demand specification will allow for calculating a separate but valid measure of consumer surplus for single purpose visitors. The primary purpose trip values from the standard TCM and simple generalized TCM model are identical at $43 per person per day and neither are significantly different from the $50 day value from a generalized model that distinguishes between joint and incidental trips. The general models avoid underestimation of total recreation site benefits that would result from omitting the consumer surplus of multi-destination visitors.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003578211

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1017/s1068280500005311


Related references

Multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in the analysis of the demand for trips to a remote recreational site. Environmental Management 43(6): 1146-1161, 2009

A utility maximizing model of the demand for multi-destination non-work travel. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 14(4): 369-386, 1980

Judgments of travel experiences, activity envelopes, trip features and multi-tasking: A panel effects regression model specification. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 63: 67-75, 2014

Conceptualization of multi-destination pleasure trips. Annals of Tourism Research 20(2): 289-301, 1993

Cost-efficient demand-pull policies for multi-purpose technologies The case of stationary electricity storage. Applied Energy 155: 334-348, 2015

A comparison of the effect of multiple destination trips on recreation benefits as estimated by travel cost and contingent valuation methods. Journal of Leisure Research 38(1): 46-60, 2006

A travel-cost analysis of the demand for hunting trips in Kansas. Review of agricultural economics 16(1): 55-61, 1994

The whale watcher's guide: whale-watching trips in North America. Unknown, 1994

Traveler geographic origin and market segmentation: the multi trips destination case. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 8(1): 111-124, 1999

Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of the Decisional Balance Scale of the Transtheoretical Model using the Multi-Trait Multi-Method approach. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 22(2): 288-294, 2008

Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: A large-scale application in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 17(3): 285-297, 2009

Multi-destination segmentation based on push and pull motives: pleasure trips of students at a U.S. university. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 21(2/3): 19-32, 2006

An exploratory analysis of multi-destination pleasure travel behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International A, Humanities and Social Sciences 53(7): p.2982, 1993

On the use of multi-algorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method for multi-site calibration of the SWAT model. Hydrological Processes 24(8): 955-969, 2010

Economic evaluation of multi-functionality of horse production using individual travel cost method. Journal of Rural Economics 77(1): 12-22, 2005