EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Advantages and disadvantages of bordeaux mixture and of lime-sulphur used on apples in the growing season
Observations on the Umaria marine bed
10 years of hearing conservation in the Royal Air Force
Chocolate crumb - dairy ingredient for milk chocolate
Effect of daily gelatin ingestion on human scalp hair
Comparison of rice bran and maize bran as feeds for growing and fattening pigs
The composition of pampas-grass (Cortaderia argentea.)
The Accraian Series:
The mechanism of the Liebermann-Burchard reaction of sterols and triterpenes and their esters
Cerebrovascular Doppler ultrasound studies (cv-Doppler)
Toria: PT-303 - first national variety
Hair growth promoting activity of tridax procumbens
Productivity of Pekin x Khaki Campbell ducks
A stable cytosolic expression of VH antibody fragment directed against PVY NIa protein in transgenic potato plant confers partial protection against the virus
Solar treatment of wheat loose smut
Swimmers itch in the Lake of Garda
Bactofugation and the Bactotherm process
The effects of prefrontal lobotomy on aggressive behavior in dogs
Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm
Breakdown of seamounts at the trench axis, viewed from gravity anomaly
Kooken; pennsylvania's toughest cave
Recovery of new dinosaur and other fossils from the Early Cretaceous Arundel Clay facies (Potomac Group) of central Maryland, U.S.A
Zubor horny (Bison bonasus) v prirodnych podmienkach Slovensku
The extended Widal test in the diagnosis of fevers due to Salmonella infection
Hair of the american mastodon indicates an adaptation to a semi aquatic habitat

Detection of seedborne pathogens


Detection of seedborne pathogens



HortTechnology 13(1): 40-47



ISSN/ISBN: 1063-0198

Plant pathogens present a serious threat to seedling establishment and the potential for plant disease epidemics under greenhouse conditions is great. Hence, pathogen exclusion by detection and elimination of infested seedlots remains a requisite tactic for seedling production and disease management. Unfortunately, the numbers of contaminated seed within a lot may be low and infested seed may be asymptomatic making their detection difficult. To address these issues seed detection assays have been developed, but many of them have shortcomings that reduce their effectiveness. Examples of frequently used seed assays include visual examination, selective media, seedling grow-out and serological assays which, while appropriate for some pathogens, often display inadequate levels of sensitivity and specificity. Recently, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as a tool for detecting microorganisms in many diverse environments. Thus far, it is clear that DNA-based detection systems exhibit higher levels sensitivity than conventional techniques. Unfortunately, PCR-based seed tests require the extraction of PCR-quality DNA from target organisms in backgrounds of saprophytic organisms and inhibitory seed-derived compounds. The inability to efficiently extract PCR-quality DNA from seeds has restricted the acceptance and application of PCR for seed detection. To overcome these limitations several modified PCR protocols have been developed including selective target colony enrichment followed by PCR (BIO-PCR) and immunomagnetic separation and PCR. These techniques seek to selectively concentrate or increase target organism populations to enhance detection and have been successfully applied for detecting bacteria in seed. Other techniques with great potential for rapid detection of seedborne pathogens include magnetic capture hybridization and PCR, and DNA-chip technology. Ultimately, PCR will be available for the detection of all seedborne pathogens and may supersede conventional detection methods.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 003705245

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Detection of seedborne pathogens. Horttechnology 13(1): 40-47, 2003

Recent advances in the detection of seedborne pathogens. Seed Science and Technology 15(3): 755-763, 1987

Detection of seedborne bacterial plant pathogens. Plant Disease 66(10): 885-890, 1982

Methods for routine detection of seedborne fungal pathogens. Journal of seed technology(2): 74-77, 1979

A method for the detection of seedborne bacterial pathogens in tomato. Phytopathology 80(10): 1001, 1990

Detection and chemical control of seedborne fungal pathogens of soybean. Journal of Soils and Crops 4(2): 131-135, 1994

Multiplex real-time PCR assays for detection of four seedborne spinach pathogens. Journal of Applied Microbiology 117(2): 472-484, 2014

New developments in seed pathology with special reference to the detection of seedborne pathogens. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 25(1-2): 38, 1995

Presumptive procedure dome test for detection of seedborne bacterial pathogens in dry beans. Plant Disease 71(11): 984-990, 1987

New techniques for detection and identification of seedborne pathogens in relation to international seed exchange and the zero tolerance concept. Seed Science and Technology 18(2): 461-466, 1990

Detection, seedborne nature, disease transmission and eradication of seedborne infection by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub) Butler in groundnut. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 33(1): 85-89, 2005

Minimizing the threat of seedborne pathogens in crop germ plasm: elimination of pea seedborne mosaic virus from the USDA-ARS germ plasm collection of Pisum sativum. Plant Disease 77(3): 220-224, 1993

Development of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for the Detection of Seedborne Fungal Pathogens Fusarium fujikuroi and Magnaporthe oryzae in Rice Seed. Plant Disease 102(8): 1549-1558, 2018

Diagnosis of seedborne pathogens. Handbook of seed science and technology: 649-675, 2006

Agrochemical products against seedborne pathogens. Petria 1(Suppl.o 1): 67-72, 1991