EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Advantages and disadvantages of bordeaux mixture and of lime-sulphur used on apples in the growing season
Observations on the Umaria marine bed
10 years of hearing conservation in the Royal Air Force
Chocolate crumb - dairy ingredient for milk chocolate
Effect of daily gelatin ingestion on human scalp hair
Comparison of rice bran and maize bran as feeds for growing and fattening pigs
The composition of pampas-grass (Cortaderia argentea.)
The Accraian Series:
The mechanism of the Liebermann-Burchard reaction of sterols and triterpenes and their esters
Cerebrovascular Doppler ultrasound studies (cv-Doppler)
Toria: PT-303 - first national variety
Hair growth promoting activity of tridax procumbens
Productivity of Pekin x Khaki Campbell ducks
A stable cytosolic expression of VH antibody fragment directed against PVY NIa protein in transgenic potato plant confers partial protection against the virus
Solar treatment of wheat loose smut
Swimmers itch in the Lake of Garda
Bactofugation and the Bactotherm process
The effects of prefrontal lobotomy on aggressive behavior in dogs
Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm
Breakdown of seamounts at the trench axis, viewed from gravity anomaly
Kooken; pennsylvania's toughest cave
Recovery of new dinosaur and other fossils from the Early Cretaceous Arundel Clay facies (Potomac Group) of central Maryland, U.S.A
Zubor horny (Bison bonasus) v prirodnych podmienkach Slovensku
The extended Widal test in the diagnosis of fevers due to Salmonella infection
Hair of the american mastodon indicates an adaptation to a semi aquatic habitat

Determinants of spectator attendance at NCAA Division II football contests


Determinants of spectator attendance at NCAA Division II football contests



Journal of Sport Management 16(4): 311-330



ISSN/ISBN: 0888-4773

DOI: 10.1123/jsm.16.4.311

The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between spectator attendance at NCAA Division II football contests and selected determinants by estimating multiple economic demand models. The 2 primary determinants analysed were winning percentage and promotional activity. Demand models were estimated using ordinary least squares and fixed-effect regression analysis. The results suggested that both current and previous year winning percentages are positively related to attendance.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003705554

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Rates and Determinants of Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in NCAA Division 1 College Football Athletes: A Study of the ACC, SEC, and PAC-12 Conferences. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2(8): 2325967114543901, 2014

An examination of preactivity and postactivity stretching practices of NCAA division I, NCAA division II, and NCAA division III track and field throws programs. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27(10): 2691-2699, 2013

Repositioning a university through NCAA Division I-A football membership. Journal of Sport Management 22(1): 11-29, 2008

The determinants of football match attendance revisited - empirical evidence from the Spanish Football League. Journal of Sports Economics 3(1): 18-38, 2002

Nutrition practices and knowledge among NCAA Division III football players. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 14: 13, 2017

Physical and performance characteristics of NCAA Division I football players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 61(4): 395-401, 1990

Allometric scaling of strength scores in NCAA division I-A football athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 28(12): 3330-3337, 2014

Performance changes during a college playing career in NCAA division III football athletes. Journal of strength and conditioning research 25(9): 2351-2357, 2011

Epidemiology of Operative Procedures in an NCAA Division I Football Team Over 10 Seasons. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 4(7): 2325967116657530, 2016

NFL-225 test to predict 1RM bench press in NCAA Division I football players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 26(10): 2623-2631, 2012

Physiological damage and stress of a competitive NCAA Division I football game. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 35(5 Suppl.): S320, 2003

Muscle characteristics and body composition of NCAA division I football players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 28(12): 3320-3329, 2014

Longitudinal Body Composition Changes in NCAA Division I College Football Players. Journal of strength and conditioning research 31(1): 1-8, 2017

Historical Patterns and Variation in Treatment of Injuries in NFL (National Football League) Players and NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) Division I Football Players. American Journal of Orthopedics 45(6): E319-E327, 2016

Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of NCAA Division I Football Players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 49: 174-175, 2017