EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Sympathetic and visceral nerve blocks
What should be done after bee or wasp stings?
Anti-drool cheiloplasty: clinical results in six dogs
The biology of human starvation: some new insights
Vitamin B12 deficiency as a worldwide problem
Effect of daily gelatin ingestion on human scalp hair
On the nature and role of vivotoxins in plant disease
History of the discovery of vitamins by N. I. Lunin
Preliminary tests with residual sprays against poultry lice
MDU.1, a new mutant chilli variety
A study on compatibility of some insecticides with a fungicide on small cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton.)
The cranial nerves of Mystus seenghala (Sykes)
The effects of prefrontal lobotomy on aggressive behavior in dogs
Human monkeypox: disease pattern, incidence and attack rates in a rural area of northern Zaire
The identity of the lipstick mold of cultivated mushrooms agaricus bisporus
Therapy for acne with saccharomyces boulardii
Advantages and disadvantages of bordeaux mixture and of lime-sulphur used on apples in the growing season
The composition of pampas-grass (Cortaderia argentea.)
Productivity of Pekin x Khaki Campbell ducks
A rapid survey of katydids (Insecta: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) of the Foret Classee du Pic de Fon, Guinea
Cranial nerves of Labeo rohita (Ham.)
Evaluating fundamentals of care: The development of a unit-level quality measurement and improvement programme
Life-cycle of the free-living nematode Pontonema vulgare in the White Sea
Grey leaf blight - a new disease of cocoa
Effect of foliar spray of urea and zinc sulphate on yield and fruit quality of Kinnow - 'a mandarin hybrid'

Distributional effects of commodity promotion programs by type of producer


Distributional effects of commodity promotion programs by type of producer



Agribusiness New York 19(3): 325-332



DOI: 10.1002/agr.10062

This study provides a theoretical background for the firm-level analysis on the distributional effects of commodity promotion programmes. The conceptual basis of this approach is that firms differ due to differences in possessing endowments of fixed factors, and net returns to firms can be viewed as rents accruing to these factors.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003716940

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

The distributional implications of agricultural commodity programs. Publication University of Wisconsin 142: 43, 1972

Land quality and producer participation in U.S. commodity programs. Review of Agricultural Economics 14(1): 105-115, 1992

Commodity promotion programs. Food, agriculture, and rural policy into the twenty first century: issues and trade offs: 303-320, 1994

Commodity checkoff programs as alternative producer investment opportunities: the case of soybeans. Agribusiness New York 15(4): 539-552, 1999

The Economics of Commodity Promotion Programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(4): 15-17, 2006

Commodity promotion programs in the United States. Research Bulletin Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University ( 99-03): ii + 33 pp., 1999

Export promotion by commodity checkoff programs. Economic effects of generic promotion programs for agricultural exports: 23-30, 1991

An Evaluation of California's Mandated Commodity Promotion Programs. Review of agricultural economicsring 29(1): 40-63, 2007

The Economics of Commodity Promotion Programs: Lessons from California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(4): 1115-1117, 2006

Voluntary funding of commodity promotion and research programs. Visions Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University 72(1): 16-24, 1999

Generic agricultural commodity advertising and promotion: international programs. AE Ext New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Dept of Agricultural Economics: (88-3) 17-20, 1988

Beggar-thy-neighbor aspects of generic commodity promotion programs. NICPRE Quarterly 8(2): 1-4, 2002

Beggar-thy-neighbor advertising: theory and application to generic commodity promotion programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(4): 8-902, 2001

Consumer Response to Commodity-Specific and Broad-Based Promotion Programs for Fruits and Vegetables. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(5): 1312-1327, 2011

Distributional and risk reduction effects of commodity revenue program design. Review Of Agricultural Economics (boston): 3, 543-553, 2008