+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Impedance vector distribution by sex, race, body mass index, and age in the United States: standard reference intervals as bivariate Z scores



Impedance vector distribution by sex, race, body mass index, and age in the United States: standard reference intervals as bivariate Z scores



Nutrition 18(2): 153-167



Bioelectrical impedance measurements were collected in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), but their results have not been published. In the NHANES III population, resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) values at 50-kHz frequency were obtained with a Valhalla Scientific meter (model 1990B; San Diego, CA, USA). The RXc graph method was used to identify bivariate pattern distributions of mean vectors (95% confidence ellipses by sex, race, age, and body mass index [BMI]), and individual impedance vectors (50%, 75%, and 95% tolerance ellipses). Data from 10 222 adults (5261 men and 4961 women) formed 90 four-way classification groups, with two sexes, three races or ethnicities (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American), five age classes (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 y), and three BMI classes (19-24.9, 25-29.9, and 30-34.9 kg/m(2)). Sex, race or ethnicity, BMI and age, in decreasing order, influenced the vector distribution pattern. Mean vectors in women were significantly longer than those in men. Within each sex, the mean vector of non-Hispanic white subjects was shorter and with a smaller phase angle than that of corresponding BMIs from the two other race/ethnic populations. Tolerance ellipses were calculated from sex- and race-specific reference populations 20 to 69 y old and 19 < or = BMI < 30 kg/m(2) (8022 subjects, 4226 men and 3796 women). After transformation of impedance vector components into bivariate Z scores (standardized deviates, as differences from the mean divided by the standard deviation of the reference population), we constructed one standard, reference, RXc-score graph (50%, 75%, and 95% tolerance ellipses) that can be used with any analyzer in any population. The pattern of impedance vector distribution and reference bivariate intervals for the individual impedance vector are presented for comparative studies (free software at E-mail: apiccoli@unipd.it).

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003805351

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11844647

DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00665-7


Related references

Impedance vector distribution by body mass index and conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis in obese women. Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 13(2): 72-79, 2003

Patterns of bioelectrical impedance vector distribution by body mass index and age: implications for body-composition analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82(1): 60-68, 2005

Psychosocial Correlates of Body Mass Index in the United States: Intersection of Race, Gender and Age. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences 10(2): E3458, 2016

Body mass index, race and mortality risks among new ESRD patients in the United States. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 14(Abstracts Issue): 714A, 2003

Variation in child body mass index patterns by race/ethnicity and maternal nativity status in the United States and England. Maternal and Child Health Journal 19(2): 373-380, 2015

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States, 2003-2006. National Health Statistics Reports (): 1-7, 2009

Associations between trends in race/ethnicity, aging, and body mass index with diabetes prevalence in the United States: a series of cross-sectional studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 161(5): 328-335, 2014

Measuring distributional inequality: relative body mass index distributions by gender, race/ethnicity, and education, United States (1999-2006). Journal of Obesity 2010: 959658, 2010

Use of body mass index and body mass index growth charts for assessment of childhood weight status in the United States: a systematic review. Clinical Pediatrics 50(2): 91-99, 2011

Forecasting distribution of body mass index in the United States: is there more room for growth?. Medical Decision Making 30(3): E1-E11, 2010

Bivariate reference intervals of the RXc graph in hemodialysis patients must be gender- and race-specific. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 11(Program and Abstract Issue): 627A, 2000

A comparison of distribution curves of body mass index from Brazil and the United States for assessing overweight and obesity in Brazilian adolescents. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 10(2): 79-85, 2001

Comparison of United States and New Zealand children's body mass scores. Journal of the Royal Society of Health 111(5): 207-207, 1991

Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index. Jpen. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 30(4): 309-316, 2006