EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
54,215,046
Abstracts:
30,230,908
PMIDs:
28,215,208
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows



Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows



Animal science: an international journal of fundamental and applied research 74(3): 503-515



Four experimental diets differing in the level and the origin of dietary fibre (DF) were studied: a control, low DF diet (diet C, 100 g total dietary fibre (TDF) per kg dry matter (DM)) and three fibre-rich diets (200 g TDF per kg DM) which corresponded to a combination of diet C and maize bran (diet MB), or wheat bran (diet WB), or sugar-beet pulp (diet SBP). During two successive experimental periods, each diet was offered to five pigs at a growing stage (35 kg body weight (BW)) and at a finishing stage (75 kg BW). In addition, four adult ovariectomized sows received successively one of the four diets according to a 4 X 4 Latin-square design. Digestive utilization of energy and nutrients of diets and rate of passage parameters were determined using a pulse dose of ytterbium oxide followed by total faecal collection. Faecal marker excretion was quantified using an age-dependent, one-compartment model, from which the mean retention time in the gastro-intestinal tract of pigs (MRT) was obtained. The digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients, especially the DF fraction, increased with the increase in BW from growing to finishing pigs (P < 0.01) and was still higher in adult sows; the difference between pig stages was more pronounced for diet MB. At each stage, the digestibility of energy or nutrients was lower (P < 0.01) for diets MB or WB than for diet SBP. Accordingly, the energy and DF digestibility of sugar-beet pulp was higher and increased much less with BW. The MRT was shorter for diets MB and WB in growing pigs and in sows. Sows had a longer MRT (81 h) than finishing pigs (37 h) and growing pigs (33 h); however, MRT was highly variable between sows. It is concluded that the degree to which different types of DF are digested depends, in part, on the botanical origin, and it may be improved by a longer MRT in the gastro-intestinal tract of pigs. Some fibrous foodstuffs (such as maize-by products) will benefit more from a longer MRT than others.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 003813252

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1017/s1357729800052668



Related references

Effects of level and botanical origin of dietary fibre on digestive utilisation and rate of passage of digesta in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. 34emes Journees de la Recherche Porcine, sous l' egide de l' Association Franccaise de Zootechnie, Paris, France, 5-7 fevrier 2002: 75-80, 2002

Influence of dietary fibre level on digestive and metabolic utilization of energy in growing and finishing pigs. Animal Research 51(3): 245-259, 2002

Influence of dietary fibre level on digestive and metabolic utilisation of energy in growing and finishing pigs. Animal Research 51(3): 245-259, May-June, 2002

Influence of dietary fibre level and pelleting on the digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Animal 3(3): 352-359, 2009

Digestive utilization and energy values of wheat, maize and their by-products in growing pigs and adult sows. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 32: 177-183, 2000

The fermentative capacity of growing pigs and adult sows fed diets with contrasting type and level of dietary fibre. Livestock Science 109(1-3, Sp. Iss. SI): 111-114, 2007

Chicory inulin extract induces differential effects on the digestive and post-absorptive utilization of dietary nutrients in growing-finishing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81(4): 624-625, December, 2001

Dietary fibre content has a bigger influence on apparent nutrient digestibility in growing/finishing pigs than the bedding material. Proceedings Of The Society Of Nutrition Physiology: 114, 2008

Digestibility trials with pigs. 1. The effect of fibre content on digestibility. Comparison of the digestive capacity of sows and growing bacon pigs. (Lantbrukshogsk. Husdjursforsoksanst. Meddel. No. 23). Smaltbarhetsforsok med svin. 1. Vaxttradhaltens inflytande pa fodrets smaltbarhet. Jamforelse mellan modersuggors och vaxande godsvins smaltbarhetsformaga, Lantbrukshogsk. Husdjursforsoksanst. Meddel., 77, 1946

Effect of dietary fibre on development of digestive tract and activity of digestive enzyme in finishing pigs. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 18(1): 34-37, 2003

Effects of a dietary organic acid mixture and of dietary fibre levels on ileal and faecal nutrient apparent digestibility, bacterial nitrogen flow, microbial metabolite concentrations and rate of passage in the digestive tract of pigs. Animal 1(3): 389-401, 2007

Hammermill versus roller mill processings for pigs ii. the effects of particle size of different processing methods of corn diets on apparent digestibilities the rate of passage and the incidence of gastric ulcers for growing finishing pigs. Journal of the Agricultural Association of China (146): 59-68, 1989

Digestive utilization of feeds in lactating sows. Comparison with growing pigs. Digestive physiology in pigs Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium Saint Malo, France 26-28 May 1997: 583-586, 1997

Effect of dietary fibre on energy metabolism of growing pigs and pregnant sows. Energy metabolism in animals Proceedings of the 15th symposium on energy metabolism in animals, Snekkersten, Denmark, 11-16 September 2000: 105-108, 2001

Effects of dietary cellulase supplementation on growth performance and fibre digestibility in growing and finishing pigs. Journal of Taiwan Livestock Research 32(4): 333-342, 1999