EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

How much of commodity price behavior can a rational expectations storage model explain?



How much of commodity price behavior can a rational expectations storage model explain?



Agricultural economics: the journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists 33(3): 289-303



A rational expectations competitive storage model was applied to the U.S. corn market, to assess the aptness of this framework in explaining monthly price behavior in an actual commodity market. Relative to previous models, extensive realism was added to the model, in terms of how production activities and storage costs are specified. By modeling convenience yield, "backwardation" in prices between crop years did not depend on the unrealistic assumption of zero ending stocks. Our model generated cash prices that were distributed with positive skewness and kurtosis, and mean and variance that increased over the storage season, comparable to the persistence and the occasional spikes observed in commodity prices. Futures prices were generated as conditional expectations of cash prices at contract maturity, and the variances of futures prices exhibited realistic time-to-maturity and seasonal patterns. Model realizations of cash and futures prices over many "years" were used to demonstrate the wide variety of price behaviors that could be observed in an efficient market with a similar market structure, implying that economic and policy implications drawn from short, historical samples of prices could be misleading.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 004187914

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0864.2005.00068.x



Related references

How much of commodity price behavior can a rational expectations storage model explain?. Staff Paper Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University (04-04): 45 pp., 2003

Price volatility and rational expectations in a sectoral framework commodity model: a multivariate GARCH approach. Agricultural Economics 42(3): 419-435, 2011

Empirically testing the law of one price in international commodity markets: a rational expectations approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, A Humanities and Social Sciences 49(7): p.1897, 1989

Empirically testing the Law of One Price in international commodity markets: a rational expectations approach. International financial markets and agricultural trade: 109-159, 1990

Quasi-rational and ex ante price expectations in commodity supply models: An empirical analysis of the US broiler market. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18(4): 407-426, 2003

Expectations and commodity price dynamics: the overshooting model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(2): 344-348, 1986

Empirically testing the law of one price in an international commodity market: a rational expectations application to the natural rubber market. Agricultural Economics 4(2): 165-177, 1990

Competitive storage, rational expectations, and short-run food price determination. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(4): 739-748, 1985

Food price determination within a macro model under rational expectations. 1982

Bounded price variation and rational expectations in an endogenous switching model of the U.S. corn market. Review of economics and statistics 71(4): 605-613, 1989

Portfolio Speculation and Commodity Price Volatility in a Stochastic Storage Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(2): 517-532, 2014

A simple model of endogenous agricultural commodity price fluctuations with storage. Agricultural Economics 43(1): 1-15, 2012

A multimarket bounded price variation model under rational expectations: corn and soybeans in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1): 10-20, 1992

Is the storage model a 'closed' empirical issue? The empirical ability of the storage model to explain price dynamics. Agricultural commodity markets and trade: new approaches to analyzing market structure and instability: 89-114, 2006

Bounded price variation models with rational expectations and price risk. Economics Letters 31(4): 0-317, 1989