EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Nonindustrial private forest owner use of federal income tax provisions



Nonindustrial private forest owner use of federal income tax provisions



Forest products journal 54(12): 59-66



Seven provisions of the federal income tax provide incentives for nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) owners to follow sound management and reforestation practices. Four provisions - long-term capital gain treatment of qualifying income, annual deduction of management costs, depreciation and the section 179 deduction, and deductions for casualty losses or other involuntary conversions - are available to taxpayers in general. The remaining provisions - the reforestation tax credit, amortization of reforestation expenses, and the ability to exclude qualifying reforestation cost-share payments from gross income - are specifically for forest owners. NIPF owners in South Carolina were surveyed by mail to determine whether they were aware of these tax provisions, whether they had made use of them, and their reasons for using or not using each one. Information also was collected on the owners' demographic characteristics, to test for differences between users and non-users of the provisions. Owner awareness and use was highest for long-term capital gain treatment of income and annual deduction of management costs. Some 78 percent of owners were aware of the two provisions, and 85 percent of owners who were aware of the provisions used them. Owner awareness was lowest for the ability to exclude qualifying reforestation cost-share payments, at 42 percent; owner use was lowest for loss deductions, at 23 percent. Membership in a forest owner organization, having a written forest management plan, and a high level of household income were associated with owner knowledge of beneficial tax provisions. No demographic characteristics were associated across-the-board with owner use of provisions.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 004250483

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Reasons for use or nonuse of federal income tax incentives for timber production by nonindustrial private forest landowners. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters National Convention: 46-451, 2001

Marketing forest products: log exports and the nonindustrial private forest owner: an overview of operations and markets. Extension circular 993 (1141,rev), 1993

The private nonindustrial forest owner and the forest owners' association. Arbetsrapport Institutionen for Skogsekonomi, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet ( 245): 29 pp. + 9 appendices, 1997

Nonindustrial private forest owner attitudes toward the use of silvicultural herbicides. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education 23(1): 46-50, 1994

A nitty gritty assessment of the economics of timber management for the nonindustrial private forest owner. PB (282 568) 22-27, 1977

Consistent estimation of long-run nonindustrial private forest owner timber supply using micro data. Canadian journal of forest research 37(8): 1485-1494, 2007

Benefit-based audience segmentation: a tool for identifying nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) owner education needs. Journal of Forestry 104(8): 419-425, 2006

State income tax implications for the nonindustrial private forest landowner. Nonindustrial private forests: a review of economic and policy studies: symposium proceedings April 19-20-1983 editors: JP Royer CD Risbrudt technical editors: JH Lohnes JS Heimerman: 122, 1983

Effect of the federal estate tax on nonindustrial private forest holdings. Journal of forestry 104(1): 15-20, 2006

Federal-state death tax implications for private nonindustrial forest landowners in the northeast. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5(2): 135-141, 1988

The federal estate tax: a potential problem for private nonindustrial forest owners in the south. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 3(3): 109-111, 1979

The impact of recent changes in state and federal death tax laws on private nonindustrial forest estates in the South. Southern journal of applied forestry 11(1): 17-22, 1987

The effects of federal and state death and gift taxes on nonindustrial private forest lands in the midwestern states. Forest Products Journal 48(9): 35-44, 1998

Sources of capital for management of private nonindustrial forest lands Federal Land Banks, government subsidy, Finance, USA. TAPPI: journal of the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry 66(1): 49-51, 1983