+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effect of irrigation and sowing date on crop yield and yield components of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate



The effect of irrigation and sowing date on crop yield and yield components of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate



Journal of Agricultural Science 141(3/4): 259-271



The canopy development, radiation absorption and its utilization for biomass production in response to irrigation at different growth stages of three Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars was studied on a Wakanui silt loam soil in Canterbury, New Zealand (43[degree]38S, 172[degree]30E). The study also aimed at quantifying the yield potential of the crop under varying irrigation regimes and sowing dates. Green area duration (GAD), intercepted radiation (Fi), radiation use efficiency (U) and total intercepted PAR were significantly (P < 0.001) increased by irrigation. Total dry matter (TDM) yield was more strongly correlated (R2 = 0.69-0.83) with GAD than seed yield (R2 = 0.60-0.69). Accumulation of TDM was highly related to intercepted PAR. Fully irrigated November-sown crops had a final U of 1.46 g DM/MJ PAR. The unirrigated crop had a U of only 0.92 g DM/MJ PAR. The U tended to decrease with delayed sowing. Averaged over the 2 years, irrigation increased seed yield by 74-124% and trends were similar for TDM yield. Seed yield was doubled in November-sown chickpeas (4.6 t/ha) and cv. Sanford produced 14 and 16% more seed than cvs Dwelley and B-90 respectively. Full irrigation from emergence to physiological maturity always gave the highest seed yield (> 4.7 t/ha), and there was no indication of a critical period of sensitivity to water stress. Based on results collected in the first growing season a simple model relating seed yield to radiation interception, U and HI was made. Results from the second growing season were then used as a simple verification to test the accuracy of predictions. The results suggest that these varieties have the potential to yield more than 4.5 t/ha of seed in Canterbury. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 004350070

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1017/s0021859603003617


Related references

Phenology and growth response to irrigation and sowing date of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate. Journal of Agricultural Science 141(3/4): 273-284, 2003

Water-use efficiency and the effect of water deficits on crop growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate. Journal of Agricultural Science 141(3/4): 285-301, 2003

Effect of date of sowing on yield and yield components of kabuli gram (Cicer arietinum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 64(9): 624-626, 1994

Effect of sowing date on growth and seed yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Israel J. agric. Res, 17: 4, 193-7. Bibl. 5, 1967

Effect of sowing date and irrigation on yield and nutrient uptake by chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under Tawa Command area. Indian Journal of Agronomy 38(2): 227-231, 1993

Sowing date, irrigation and nitrogen effects on biomass and grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a Mediterranean environment. Agricoltura Mediterranea 133(2): 130-140, 2003

Effect of sowing density on the yield and yield components of spring-sown irrigated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) grown in Spain. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 33(4): 367-371, 2005

Inter-character association among yield and its components in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). New Botanist 29(1/4): 55-62, 2002

Pre sowing and post sowing irrigation effect on nodule weight grain yield and nutrient uptake in chickpea cicer arietinum l. Crop Improvement 13(2): 138-143, 1986

Comparison winter and spring sowing dates and effect of plant density on yield, yield components and some quality, morphological traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under environmental condition of Urmia, Iran. 2007

Effect of some growth regulators on yield and yield components of kabuli gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Pantnagar Journal of Research 3(2): 175-177, 1978

Influence of varying plant densities and two sowing methods on yield and yield components of four varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under dry land conditions in Ali Goodarz, Lorestan. Agricultural Science Tabriz 13(3): Pe15-Pe30, 2, 2003

Effect of sowing dates and seed treatments on yield, some yield parameters and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 9(25): 3833-3839, 2010

Interactions between genotypes and sowing dates for yield and its components in chickpea cicer arietinum. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 56(4): 224-226, 1986

Effect of different irrigation levels on phenology, physiology characteristics, and yield components of three chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars in Mashhad. Agricultural Sciences and Technology 20(3): Pe21-Pe32, 2006