+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The relative susceptibility of different varieties of gram (Cicer arietinum L.) to Dhora (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)



The relative susceptibility of different varieties of gram (Cicer arietinum L.) to Dhora (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)



Pakistan Entomologist 23(1/2): 53-56



The susceptibility of 6 gram cultivars (C-44, C-612, C-727, Noor-91, Paidar-91 and Bittle-98) to Callosobruchus chinensis (commonly called as dhora) was studied in the laboratory at 30+or-2 degrees C temperature and 65+or-5% relative humidity.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 004361631

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Relative resistance of 8 important varieties of gram cicer arietinum to pulse beetle callosobruchus chinensis. Indian Journal of Entomology 34(1): 50-51, 1972

Relative susceptibility of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 59(2): 135-136, 1989

Further studies on the relative resistance of some important varieties of Bengal gram Cicer arietinum L. to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). Bulletin of Grain Technology 8(1-2): 14-17, 1970

Relative susceptibility of some gram cicer arietinum varieties to pulse beetle callosobruchus maculatus in storage. Legume Research 5(1): 45-48, 1982

Relative susceptibility of some gram (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus Fab.) in storage. Legume Researchrecd 1984; 5(1): 45-48, 1982

Relative resistance of eight important varieties of gram Cicer arietinum(Linn.) to pulse beetle, callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). Indian journal of entomology: ), 34 (1) 50-51, 1973

Relative resistance of eight important varieties of gram Cicer arietinum (Linn.) to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). Indian Journal of Entomology 1973; 34(1): 50-51, 1972

Varietal susceptibility of gram (Cicer arietinum Linn.) to bruchids, Callosobruchus analis (Fbr.) and Callosobruchus chinensis (Linn.). (Bruchidae: Coleoptera). Journal of Agricultural Research, Pakistan 15(3): 299-309, 1977

Physico chemical characteristics of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) infested bengal gram (Cicer arietinum). Legume Research 17(1): 27-31, 1994

Host susceptibility of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars to Callosobruchus chinensis and C-analis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(5): 372-374, 2009

Relative resistance of some genotypes of chickpea, Cicer arietinum L. to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Research and Development Reporter 4(2): 204-207, 1987

Influence of phenotypic characters of chick pea cicer arietinum cultivars on their susceptibility to callosobruchus chinensis. Legume Research 7(1): 54-56, 1984

Occurrence of parasitoid, Anisopteromalus calandrae (Howard) on bruchid, Callosobruchus chinensis Linn. infesting gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Entomological Research (New Delhi) 20(1): 87-88, 1996

Efficacy of some safer grain protectants against the pulse beetle callosobruchus chinensis infesting stored bengal gram cicer arietinum. PKV Research Journal 9(1): 53-55, 1985

Relative susceptibility of twenty germplasms of gram to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis Linnaeus. Bulletin of Grain Technologyrecd 1985; 21(1): 31-36, 1983