+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of methods of inducing a pause in egg production in cross bred layers



A comparison of methods of inducing a pause in egg production in cross bred layers



Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31(6): 1153-1161



Three methods of inducing a pause in egg production in 84 wk old crossbred layers were compared with the conventional method of feed and water restriction. The alternative methods were the feeding of a nutritionally balanced diet high in Zn, a nutritionally balanced diet low in Ca and a nutritionally imbalanced diet low in Ca in the form of wheat alone. Birds on the low Ca diet and birds fed only on wheat were slow to reduce their rates of lay, and their subsequent rates of egg production were significantly lower than those of birds from the other treatments. Leg weakness was a major problem in birds on the nutritionally balanced, low Ca diet but not in birds fed on wheat only. In a 2nd experiment, graded levels of supplementary Zn were used to determine the optimum concentration required to induce a pause in egg production. Compared with birds rested by the conventional method, the birds given a diet high in Zn (18.7 g/kg diet) took approximately the same time to cease laying and to return to 50% production, and there were no significant differences in any production parameters examined. When graded levels of dietary Zn were used, only the 2 highest levels (7.5 and 18.7 g/kg) were effective in producing a pause in egg production. Feed intake was related to dietary Zn levels: high dietary Zn supplementation suppressed appetite and reduced daily feed intake to extremely low levels.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 004562543

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in zambia 4. weaner production from pure bred and reciprocally cross bred dams. Animal Production 33(2): 165-178, 1981

Comparison of three estrus detection methods in cross bred Darashuri mares. Indian Veterinary Journal 85(1): 23-25, 2008

Reproductive performance of cross bred ewes when mated to pure bred and cross bred rams under accelerated lambing. Journal of Animal Science 51(Suppl. 1): 116, 1980

A comparison of cross bred and pure bred boars for semen and reproductive characteristics. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58(1): 63-70, 1978

Growth comparison of pure bred and cross bred bulls in nigeria. Journal Of Animal Science: 177-178, 1970

Comparison of pure bred and cross bred heifer reproduction and disposal. Journal of Dairy Science 65(Suppl. 1): 91, 1982

Comparison of cross bred and pure bred boars for progeny growth and carcass merit. Animal Production 27(1): 29-34, 1978

Lamb and wool production of pure bred and cross bred ewes. Journal of Animal Science 34(5): 887, 1972

Comparison of sire breeds for cross bred lamb production from new zealand romney ewes. Annales de Genetique et de Selection Animale 7(2): 231-232, 1975

Comparison of milk production traits in friesian x white fulani cross bred cattle. Animal Production 32(2): 165-170, 1981

A comparison of cross bred calves by simmenthal and friesian sires for some beef production traits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18(93): 488-493, 1978

Effects of different husbandry systems on milk production of pure bred and cross bred sheep. Animal Production 31(2): 171-176, 1980

Sow productivity comparisons for 4 breeds of swine in the production of pure bred and cross bred litters. Journal of Animal Science 53(Suppl. 1): 74, 1981

A comparison of the performance of pure bred and cross bred rams. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 53(5): 517-520, 1983

Milk yields compositions and production effects in straight bred and cross bred beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 55(Suppl. 1): 3, 1982