Comparison of Roche RIA, Roche EIA, Hybritech EIA, and Abbott EIA methods for measuring carcinoembryonic antigen

Nisselbaum, J.S.; Smith, C.A.; Schwartz, D.; Schwartz, M.K.

Clinical Chemistry 34(4): 761-764

1988


ISSN/ISBN: 0009-9147
PMID: 3282721
Accession: 005011778

Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS

Article/Abstract emailed within 1 workday
Payments are secure & encrypted
Powered by Stripe
Powered by PayPal

Abstract
Using 600 clinical specimens, we compared the concordance of four methods for carcinoembryonic antigen: the Roche RIA (I); the Roche EIA (II); Hybritech EIA (III); and Abbott EIA (IV). EDTA-treated plasma was used for Methods I and II and serum for Methods III and IV. However, no significant difference was found between results for serum and plasma in Method II. The normal reference interval (in micrograms/L) was I (222 specimens), 1.94 +/- 1.54; II (57 specimens), 0.8 +/- 0.5; III (100 specimens), 2.94 +/- 2.47; and IV (614 specimens), less than 5.0. The precision of all four methods was acceptable. Concordance among all of the methods exceeded 90%.