+ Site Statistics
+ Resolve Accession
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
Submit PDF Full TextSubmit PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Differences in the androgen response between two mouse species

, : Differences in the androgen response between two mouse species. Biochemical Genetics 24(11-12): 805-812

Renal weight and .beta.-glucuronidase activity are two of several well-characterized androgen-responsive parameters in Mus musculus. A similar sexual dimorphism was not reported for a second mouse species, Mus caroli, however. Since this was not associated with a general absence of androgen action, we considered whether a localized defect in androgen receptors or a difference in renal androgen-responsive endpoints in the two species existed. Only minor differences in the characteristics of renal androgen receptors from the two species were found when they were analyzed by two different methods. These differences were not thought to be sufficient to account for the apparent renal androgen unresponsiveness. No differences were found in androgen receptors from brain. Subsequently, a third renal endpoint, ornithine decarboxylase activity, was found to respond to androgen stimulation in Mus caroli. Control of renal androgen action in these two mouse species thus differs at the level of genetic regulatory elements.

Order PDF Full Text


Click here to order any other PDF Full Text

Accession: 005151082

PMID: 3800866

DOI: 10.1007/bf00554520

PDF Full Text: Differences in the androgen response between two mouse species

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:

Other references

HUBSCHMANN.K.; KRAUSKOPF.J.; FRAGNER.P., 1956: Determination of incidence of fungi in the third and fourth interdigital spaces of right hand. Ceskoslovenska Dermatologie 31(1): 47-49

Cline, M.N.; Esfeld, M.A., 1998: New horizons for the amber waves Technologies boost the capabilities of wheat. Cereal Foods World 43(1): 5-10, Jan

Joshi, S.; Cauch Dudek, K.; Wanless, I.R.; Heathcote, E.J., 1999: Response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis patients with additional features of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 30(4 PART 2): 496A, Oct

Loustau, O.; Sans, N.; Despeyroux, M-Line.; Chiavassa-Gandois, Hélène.; Vial, J.; Railhac, J-Jacques., 2006: Shoulder pain: imaging examinations. Non-traumatic shoulder pain is a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Usually, the clinical examination is supplemented by nowadays well-defined imaging studies. Radiography is the first examination to be requested on a systematic basis. It always...

Anonymous, 2016: Not Available. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 59(9): 1182-1182

Allen D.E., 1990: Micromorphy in new forest england uk rubi. Watsonia 18(1): 81

Karmysheva, I.V.; Vladimirov, V.G.; Volkova, N.I.; Vladimirov, A.G.; Kruk, N.N., 2011: Two types of high-grade metamorphism in west Sangilen southeast Tuva. Doklady Earth Sciences 441.1

Mork, Cato, 1997: Loss of hair: Causes, diagnosis, clinical manifestations and management. Loss of hair is a common complaint and may lead to psychosocial problems. Even the physiological and mildest forms of alopecia can cause considerable distress, and some degree of dysmorphophobia is experienced in a proportion of the patients. Hair...

CAPROTTI, M., 1961: On a case of retro-ocular tumor diagnosed by orbitography. Annali di Radiologia Diagnostica 34: 403-410

Pras, M.; Pras, E.; Kastner, D., 1995: The origin of the FMF gene. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 31(8): 503-504