EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Differences in the maturation of the immune response of a negative and a positive rabbits good and poor responders respectively for the a antigen


Immunology 33(1): 91-100
Differences in the maturation of the immune response of a negative and a positive rabbits good and poor responders respectively for the a antigen
The amount, avidity and specificity of anti-A antibodies produced by rabbits having the A substance in their secretions (A+) and rabbits lacking this antigen (A-) were studied with a series of antigens chemically related to the A substance. A- and A+ rabbits produced specific anti-A antibodies, but the amount, maturation of avidity and specificity of these antibodies was completely different. The difference between the immune response of A+ and A- animals may not be based on a genetically determined inability of A+ rabbits to recognize the self antigen, but rather on differences in the regulatory mechanism(s) controlling the maturation process of the anti-A response.


Accession: 005151380



Related references

Differences in the maturation of the immune response of A- and A+ rabbits. Good and poor responders respectively for the A antigen. Immunology 33(1): 91-99, 1977

The identification of an immune response associated antigen positive surface immuno globulin negative thy 1 antigen negative cell in bone marrow. Journal of Immunology 121(4): 1606, 1978

Early differentiation between good and poor response to growth hormone therapy in short children born small for gestational age (SGA) to improve the outcome of poor responders. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism 27(3-4): 229-235, 2014

Differences in change in coping styles between good responders, moderate responders and non-responders to pulmonary rehabilitation. Respiratory Medicine 109(12): 1540-1545, 2016

The immune response of HgA-negative rabbits to HgA-positive red cells treated with N-ethylmaleimide. Immunology 26(5): 877-883, 1974

EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate and dexamphetamine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology 113(2): 194-205, February, 2002

EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate and dexamphetamine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology 113(2): 194-205, 2002

EEG coherence in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate. Psychiatry Research 180(2-3): 114-119, 2011

Differences in immune response between HCV positive, HIV negative haemophilia A and B patients. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 79(1): 59-61, 1998

EEG differences between good and poor responders to methylphenidate in boys with the Inattentive type of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology 113(8): 1191-1198, August, 2002