EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in beef cattle predicted response based on an index of feed intake and gain vs feed gain ratio



Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in beef cattle predicted response based on an index of feed intake and gain vs feed gain ratio



Journal of Animal Science 65(SUPPL 1): 195



As part of a diverent selection experiment (high vs low feed conversion) designed to obtain realized genetic parameter estimates for postweaning feed conversion, 35 Angus bull calves were selected each year from 1979 through 1983 to be fed in a 140-d postweaning performance test. From these 35 individually-fed bulls, the three most efficient and three least efficient (in terms of kilograms of total digestible nutrients required per kilogram of gain) were selected each year to each be mated to approximately 20 purebred Angus cowsin a test herd. In the last 2 yr of the experiment, feed:gain ratios were adjusted the differences in maintenance requirements before selection. An alternative to selection based on feed/gain or adjusted feed/gain would have been to select on an index of feed intake and gain (Index3 = -1.0 feed intake + 3.87 gain) where feed intake was either unadjusted (AdjIndex3) for differences in maintenance requirements. Residual correlations (year effects removed) among the four selection criteria were large( r .gtoreq. .76; P < .01) as were correlations among ranks of the bulls based on the four selection criteria ( r .gtoreq. .75). Predicted genetic change for feed:gain ratio in both the high and low directions was greater when selection was based on feed:gain ratio or Index 3. Genetic changes expected to result from selection for feed:gain ratio or Index3 were similar, as were genetic changes expected due to selection for adjusted feed:gain ratio or AdjIndex3. Results indicated little advantage to use of an index of feed intake and gain in place of the feed:gain ratio if the goal is to bring about genetic improvement in postweaning feed conversion of beef cattle.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 005184110

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 3667461



Related references

Progeny response in lean tissue feed conversion to selection for postweaning gain among boars with limited feed intake. Research report P (939) 1-6, 1994

Some genetic aspects of feed intake, gain and feed conversion of young bulls on postweaning gain test. 3rd World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA, July 16-22, 1986 XI Genetics of reproduction, lactation, growth, adaptation, disease, and parasite resistance: 291-295, 1986

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in Angus beef cattle. 4. Phenotypic correlations between body measurements and feed conversion. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 7(3): 435-440, 1994

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in Angus beef cattle. 5. Prediction of feed conversion using weights and linear body measurements. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 7(3): 441-448, 1994

Feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake and cholecystokinin type A receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with feed intake and average daily gain in a Chinese local chicken population. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 9: 50-50, 2018

Estimation of genetic parameters among average daily gain, daily feed intake and feed conversion of beef bulls during postweaning feedlot performance test using an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 77(SUPPL 1): 203, 1994

Effect of conservation and dry matter concentration of forage from grassland on feed intake, daily gain, and feed conversion ratio of growing cattle: a review. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsog ( 711): 1-44, 1992

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in angus beef cattle mean comparisons for postweaning and carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 66(SUPPL 1): 107-108, 1988

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in beef cattle. 1987 Beef Cattle Research Report: ; 25-33, 1988

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in Angus beef cattle. Beef Cattle Research Report, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Centre: 38-49, 1988

Selection in beef cattle: postweaning feed consumption and efficiency of gain. Journal of animal science1(1): 66, 1980

Optimizing feed intake recording and feed efficiency estimation to increase the rate of genetic gain for feed efficiency in beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 97(3): 456-465, 2017

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in Angus beef cattle: I. Mean comparisons. Journal of Animal Science 69(11): 4348-4359, 1991

Genetic analyses of weight gain, feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. Dissertation Abstracts International, B 39(12, Pt. 1): 5671, 1979

Effect of monensin on gain and feed intake on feed conversion in castrated and entire cattle. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia 22(1): 64-71, 1993