+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Effects of method of subject selection (volunteer vs random) and treatment variable on motor performance

Effects of method of subject selection (volunteer vs random) and treatment variable on motor performance

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 52(4): 433-440

Possible interaction effects between method of subject (human) selection (volunteer vs. random) and a selected treatment variable (verbal encouragment) were tested. The presence of such an interaction would suggest that generalizations regarding verbal encouragement could be made only to specific subject populations. Volunteer (10) and randomly selected (40) subjects were randomly assigned to either a verbal encouragement condition or to a control group with no verbal encouragement. Dependent variables were a tapping task and a leg lift task. It was predicted that volunteer subjects, due to their higher need for approval and greater desire to accommodate, would perform significantly better under the verbal encouragement condition than would the randomly selected subjects. Multivariate and univariate data analyses indicated that the prediction was supported on the tapping task (female subjects only) but not on the leg lift task. At least on certain tasks, use of volunteer subjects may result in a selection bias .times. treatment interaction effect that could limit the generalizability of research results.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 005314075

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7330436

DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1981.10607888

Related references

A partial reinforcement extinction effect in perceptual motor performance coerced vs volunteer subject populations. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: 143-145, 1972

A "partial reinforcement extinction effect" in perceptual-motor performance: coerced versus volunteer subject populations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 92(1): 143-145, 1972

Recursive Random Forests Enable Better Predictive Performance and Model Interpretation than Variable Selection by LASSO. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 55(4): 736-746, 2016

Variable selection for random effects two-part models. Statistical Methods in Medical Research: 962280218784712-962280218784712, 2018

r2VIM: A new variable selection method for random forests in genome-wide association studies. Biodata Mining 9(): 7-7, 2016

Joint variable selection for fixed and random effects in linear mixed-effects models. Biometrics 66(4): 1069-1077, 2011

Bayesian nonparametric centered random effects models with variable selection. Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 55(2): 217-230, 2014

Bayesian variable selection for longitudinal substance abuse treatment data subject to informative censoring. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C Applied statistics 56(3): 293-311, 2007

The experimental subject. I. The psychiatric evaluation and selection of a volunteer population. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 80(1): 65-70, 1958

Cross sex effects of subject and audience during motor performance. Research Quarterly 46(3): 379-384, 1975

A Systematic Approach for Variable Selection With Random Forests: Achieving Stable Variable Importance Values. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 14(11): 1988-1992, 2017

Quantitative structure-property relationships of retention indices of some sulfur organic compounds using random forest technique as a variable selection and modeling method. Journal of Separation Science 39(19): 3835-3842, 2016

Advances in variable selection methods; II, Effect of variable selection method on classification of hydrologically similar watersheds in three Mid-Atlantic ecoregions. Journal of Hydrology 438-439, 2012

A solution method for linear and geometrically nonlinear MDOF systems with random properties subject to random excitation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 13(2): 85-95, 1998

Effects of social reinforcement, subject sex, and experimenter sex on children's motor performance. Research Quarterly 43(2): 187-196, 1972