EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults


Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 53(6): 957-962
Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults
Fractures of the distal femur comprise 4% of all femoral fractures. The records of a consecutive series, from 1969-1976, of 135 adult patients with 137 fractures, not caused by malignant disease, were reviewed for age, sex, previous disease, type of fracture, treatment and end-result. Eighty-four per cent of the patients were over 50 yr of age, 19% had other general factors predisposing them to fracture, and 42% had previous or current disease of the fractured leg. Eighty-three fractures were caused by moderate and 52 by severe trauma. Unicondylar fractures were separated into lateral or medial type. Ten fractures were open and 45 were operated on primarily, mostly using condylar plates, screws or Rush pins. Satisfactory results (pain-free knee without angular deformity and at least 90.degree. of motion) were achieved in two-thirds of the fractures following both non-surgical and surgical treatment. However, the surgical group was an average of 8 yr younger and contained a higher proportion of bicondylar fractures than the nonsurgical group. Treatment in traction involved a mean period of 7 wk for 47 patients. This expensive treatment is no longer used for femoral neck, trochanteric or shaft fractures. In distal femoral fractures the goal should also be early mobilization, if necessary using surgical treatment.

Accession: 005375823

PMID: 7180408

DOI: 10.3109/17453678208992855

Download PDF Full Text: Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults



Related references

Comparative study of less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and the condylar support plates for the treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures in adults. Zhongguo Gu Shang 28(2): 136-140, 2015

New anterolateral approach of distal femur for treatment of distal femoral fractures. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 27(11): 1296-1299, 2014

Prevention of complications after treatment of femoral shaft and distal femoral fractures. Instructional Course Lectures 58: 21-25, 2009

Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1984. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: 188-194, 1988

Internal fixation with the supporting steel of AO femoral condyles for treatment of complicated distal femoral fractures. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 20(7): 706-708, 2006

Treatment of distal femoral fractures with minimally invasive percutaneous buttress plate osteosynthesis of femoral condyle. Zhongguo Gu Shang 21(11): 862-863, 2009

Management of implant-stable distal femoral periprosthetic fractures by distal femoral locking plate: A retrospective study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 49(6): 680-680, 2016

Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: 252-257, 2004

Management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures by distal femoral locking plate: A retrospective study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 49(2): 199-207, 2015

External fixation of distal femoral fractures in adults' multicentre retrospective study of 43 patients. Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 100(8): 867-872, 2015