+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Evaluation of a method for studying forgetting is data from split half recognition tests contaminated by test interference

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11(2): 126-128
Evaluation of a method for studying forgetting is data from split half recognition tests contaminated by test interference
Split-half recognition testing is a method of investigating forgetting in which a human subject studies a list of items and then is given a recognition test covering half the items on the list. At a later time, a final recognition test covering the other half of the items is given. Whether taking the 1st recognition test affected the subject's recognition accuracy on the 2nd test was investigated. The 1st test apparently did not affect performance on the 2nd test, provided the 2 tests were separated by 24 h or more.

Accession: 005395229

Related references

Intentional forgetting reduces color-naming interference: evidence from item-method directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 39(1): 220-236, 2013

Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?. Memory & Cognition 37(4): 464-476, 2009

Interference resolution in retrieval-induced forgetting: behavioral evidence for a nonmonotonic relationship between interference and forgetting. Memory & Cognition 41(4): 511-518, 2014

Retrieval-induced forgetting occurs in tests of item recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(1): 125-130, 2004

Split-half and test-retest Hand Test reliabilities for pathological samples. Journal of Clinical Psychology 37(3): 589-592, 1981

Forgetting due to retroactive interference: a fusion of Müller and Pilzecker's (1900) early insights into everyday forgetting and recent research on anterograde amnesia. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 43(5): 616-634, 2007

Finding retrieval-induced forgetting in recognition tests: a case for baseline memory strength. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1102-1102, 2014

Specificity data for the b Test, Dot Counting Test, Rey-15 Item Plus Recognition, and Rey Word Recognition Test in monolingual Spanish-speakers. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 37(6): 614-621, 2016

The interference theory of forgetting. A classical hypothesis about forgetting is that learning some things tends to make one forget others. This mechanism can be demonstrated, and modern experiments have led to a deeper konwledge of how it works. Scientific American 217(4): 117-21 Passim, 1967

Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Psychological Science 23(11): 1337-1344, 2013