EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Evaluation of a special low birth weight formula, with and without the use of medium chain triacylglycerols


Early Human Development 13(1): 87-95
Evaluation of a special low birth weight formula, with and without the use of medium chain triacylglycerols
A special low birth weight formula containing 1.8 g/100 ml of medium chain triacylglycerols (Nenatal) was compared with 'modified' Nenatal (medium chain triacylglycerols (MCT) replaced by long chain triacylglycerols (LCT)) and standard modified baby milk (Cow and Gate Premium). 22 infants of birth weight less than 1500 g and gestational age less than 33 weeks were studied for three weeks when enteral feeds were well tolerated. Nenatal was given to all infants for the first and third weeks, during the middle week 11 infants received Premium and 11 infants received modified Nenatal. On Nenatal there was a significant elevation of serum .beta.-hydroxybutyrate and small amounts of medium chain fatty acids were detected in the serum. Glucose and long chain triaclyglycerol levels were similar on all feeds. Incremental weight gain and energetic efficiency of weight gain was significantly greater on Nenatal than on Premium, but there was no difference in this respect between Nenatal and modified Nenatal. We conclude that the use of a special low birth weight formula is associated with increased weight gain, but this is not dependent on the presence of MCT in the feed. Therefore although feeds containing MCT are well tolerated, there seems little advantage in including MCT in the formulation of low birth weight feeds.


Accession: 005395742

PMID: 3956425

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3782(86)90102-7



Related references

Absorption of medium chain trigylyceride in the low-birth-weight infant and nutritional evaluation of MCT milk formula for low-birth-weight infants using the Latin square technic. Kurume Medical Journal 16(4): 191-201, 1969

Absorption of medium chain triglyceride in the low-birth-weight infant and nutritional evaluation of MCT milk formula for low-birth-weight infant nutrition using the Latin square technique. Kurume med. J, 16: 4, 191-201, 1969

Nutritional value of medium chain triglyceride dried milk formula in low birth weight infants (with special reference to protein and lipid metabolisms and renal solute load). Acta paediat. jap. (Domestic Edn), 75: 54-66, 1971

Absorption of medium chain triglyceride in the low birth weight infant and evalua-tion of MCT milk formula for low birth weight infant nutrition using of the Latin square technique. Kurume Med. J, 16: 191-201, 1969

Composition of weight gain and macronutrient storage in very low birth weight vlbw infants fed own mothers milk omm or medium chain triglyceride mct enriched formula. 1987

Improved fat and calcium absorption in low birth weight infants fed a medium chain tri glyceride containing formula. Pediatric Research 8(4): 378, 1974

Energy balance in low birth weight infants fed formula of high or low medium-chain triglyceride content. Journal of pediatrics 108(6): 964-971, 1986

Safety evaluation of a medium- and long-chain triacylglycerol oil produced from medium-chain triacylglycerols and edible vegetable oil. Food and Chemical Toxicology 44(9): 1530-1538, 2006

The effect of medium chain triglycerides in formula on gastrointestinal tolerance fat absorption plasma ketone and urinary dicarboxylic acid levels in low birth weight infants. Clinical Research 37(1): 211A, 1989

Gastrointestinal tolerance, fat absorption, plasma ketone and urinary dicarboxylic acid levels in low-birth-weight infants fed different amounts of medium-chain triglycerides in formula. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 17(2): 145-152, 1993