+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Evaluation of aggressive surgery for carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts

Annals of Surgery 191(1): 23-29
Evaluation of aggressive surgery for carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts
The records of 80 consecutive patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer, 45 women and 35 men, median age 70 years (33-89 years), were reviewed. The histologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in 45 patients, 34 cholangiocarcinoma and one squamous cell carcinoma. In 34 patients the tumor was located to the confluence, the right or left hepatic duct, in 16 to the middle and in four to the distal portion of the bile duct. In the remaining 26 patients the tumor comprised more than one of these locations (mixed location). Twenty-seven of the 80 patients (34%) were operated on with resection of the tumor. Among patients 70 years of age and younger the resectability rate was 57%. In nine patients the main surgical procedure was bile duct resection, in 15 patients bile duct resection and liver lobe resection, in 2 patients total pancreatectomy and in one local excision were performed. The resection of the tumor was regarded as radical in 12 patients and palliative in 15. The mortality rate was 11% after resection as compared to 30% in patients with nonresectable tumors. The most common postoperative complication was insufficiency of the anastomosis which occurred in seven patients. Three of these patients required reoperation. The median survival time in patients operated on with radical resection was 20 months, palliative resection 7(1/2) months and in patients with nonresectable tumors 2(1/2) months. The quality of life was estimated according to a special schedule and was found to be improved after resection as compared to nonresection. Patients operated with radical resection spent significantly less of their remaining life at hospital as compared to palliatively resected patients or patients with nonresectable tumors.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 005395989

PMID: 6153259

DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198001000-00005

Related references

Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts: results of an aggressive surgical approach. Surgery 98(4): 752-759, 1985

Adenocarcinoma with pyloric gland phenotype of the extrahepatic bile ducts: a previously unrecognized and distinctive morphologic variant of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Human Pathology 43(12): 2292-2298, 2013

Pathology of gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. Case 8. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of extrahepatic bile duct without invasive carcinoma (WHO 2010), with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ (pTisNx, TNM 7th edition): "Dysplastic degenerated biliary papillomatosis, but non-invasive". Annales de Pathologie 34(4): 324-333, 2015

Personal experience with neoplasms of the extrahepatic bile ducts: biliary obstruction without jaundice; a case of adenocarcinoma of the terminal bile duct & ampulla of Vater & a case of carcinoma of the hepatic duct with lithiasis of the terminal bile ducts. Revista Espanola de Las Enfermedades del Aparato Digestivo Y de la Nutricion 16(1): 22-33, 1957

Reoperations on the extrahepatic bile ducts after surgery of the common bile duct or its indirect drainage. Revista de Chirurgie, Oncologie, Radiologie, O.R.L., Oftalmologie, Stomatologie. Chirurgie 30(6): 411-422, 1981

Surgery of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Klinicheskaia Khirurgiia: 57-57, 1983

Surgery of extrahepatic bile ducts. Vestnik Khirurgii Imeni I. I. Grekova 144(3): 47-51, 1990

Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Proc Inst Med Chicago 21(3): 68-69, 1956

Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Gaceta Med Mexico 91(5): 379-392, 1961

Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Annals of Surgery 169(4): 525-532, 1969