+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laboratory annoyance and different traffic noise sources



Laboratory annoyance and different traffic noise sources



Journal of Sound & Vibration 70(3): 333-341



The acute annoyance reaction to different noise sources (lorries, aircraft, mopeds and trains) was investigated in a laboratory experiment. Students were exposed to different noise climates at noise levels 70 and 80 dB(A) for 25 min and their reactions were subsequently assessed by questionnaire. Their general sensitivity to noise was also evaluated. Leq [energy equivalent sound level] gave the best correlation with annoyance. Lorry noise was less disturbing than aircraft noise at the same Leq value. This was more pronounced if the different noises were compared at equal peak dB(A) levels. Other factors such as the irregularity of the noise or the individual experience of the noise are of importance for the annoyance reaction. A relationship was found between the general annoyance score and annoyance reactions in the laboratory. Questionnaires could thus be a suitable tool for identifying noise sensitive persons.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 005787471

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(80)90303-x


Related references

Traffic noise and annoyance under laboratory conditions. Ergonomics: 558, 1974

Laboratory studies on traffic noise annoyance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 52(3): 415-422, 1977

Noise annoyance from industrial and road traffic combined noises a survey and a total annoyance model comparison. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32(2): 178-186, 2012

Road traffic noise: self-reported noise annoyance versus GIS modelled road traffic noise exposure. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 13(11): 3237-3245, 2012

Short-term annoyance reactions to stationary and time-varying wind turbine and road traffic noise: A laboratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139(5): 2949-2949, 2016

A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(6): 3746-3753, 2012

Traffic noise abatement How different pavements, vehicle speeds and traffic densities affect annoyance levels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 17(4): 321-326, 2012

Noise sensitivity and annoyance caused by traffic noise in persons with impaired hearing. Journal of Sound and Vibration 127(3): 543-548, 1988

Linking traffic noise, noise annoyance and life satisfaction: a case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10(5): 1895-1915, 2013

Traffic noise annoyance and noise sensitivity in persons with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Sound & Vibration 88(1): 85-98, 1983

Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environment International 35(3): 552-556, 2008

Relationship between noise annoyance from road traffic noise and cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis. Noise & Health 13(52): 251-259, 2011

Road-traffic noise: annoyance, risk perception, and noise sensitivity in the Finnish adult population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(6): 5712-5734, 2016

Comparing the relationships between noise level and annoyance in different surveys a railway noise vs. aircraft and road traffic comparison. Journal of Sound and Vibration 81(1): 51-80, 1982

Opportunities for Environmental Noise Mapping in Saudi Arabia: A Case of Traffic Noise Annoyance in an Urban Area in Jeddah City. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13(5): -, 2017