+ Translate

On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity

, : On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 16(2): 177-180

Twelve pigeons were given successive discrimination training involving variable-interval reinforcement for key pecking in the presence of one intensity of monochromatic light randomly alternated with extinction for pecking during another intensity. All of the pigeons were then tested in extinction for generalization along the intensity dimension, and all showed a displacement of maximal responding from the positive stimulus in the direction opposite the negative stimulus. For six of the pigeons, for which the test included only three values beyond the positive stimulus, four showed peaked gradients but two did not, showing monotonic gradients with maximal responding to the most extreme test value. For another six pigeons tested over a wider range, all showed peaked gradients. Thus, when a sufficiently wide range of test values is employed, generalization gradients for visual intensity have the same peaked form as do gradients for qualitative visual dimensions such as wavelength or line angle.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 006027275

PMID: 5121854

DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-177

Submit PDF Full Text: Here

Submit PDF Full Text

No spam - Every submission is manually reviewed

Due to poor quality, we do not accept files from Researchgate

Submitted PDF Full Texts will always be free for everyone
(We only charge for PDFs that we need to acquire)

Select a PDF file:

Related references

Heinemann E.G.; Chase S., 1970: On the form of stimulus generalization curves for auditory intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84(3): 483-486

Ohmura H., 1986: The role of stimulus intensity color and form in visual stream segregation. The role of stimulus intensity (luminance), color and form on visual stream segregation (VISS) was studied through three experiments, using six undergraduates as subjects. The results were as follows. There were no effects of stimulus intensity on...

Meyer, W.J.; Orgel, A., 1969: The effects of age, stimulus intensity, and training trials on mediated stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 7(2): 326-338

Spiker, C.C., 1956: The stimulus generalization gradient as a function of the intensity of stimulus lights. Child Development 27(2): 85-98

Hearst E., 1969: Stimulus intensity dynamism and auditory generalization for approach and avoidance behavior in rats conditional stimulus electric shock. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology 68(1 PART 1): 111-117

Terrill, Ane Stewart Fiske, 1965: Stimulus extensity and response intensity in stimulus generalization. Diss Abstr: 510

Hull, C.L., 1949: Stimulus intensity dynamism (V) and stimulus generalization. Psychological Review 56(2): 67-76

Heyman, W., 1957: Certain relationships between stimulus intensity and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 53(4): 239-248

Edel, H.; Schubert, D.; Römer, B.; Kinder, I.; Milev, E., 1970: Experimental clinical checking over of new conceptions on the course of the stimulus intensity-stimulus duration (I-t) curves. Elektro Medizin; Biomedizin und Technik 15(4): 155-158

Thomas, D.R.; DeRosa, D.V., 1966: Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer. IV. Concurrent generalization of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus functions following fixed-interval training. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72(2): 260-262