EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Prospective randomized study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones






British Medical Journal 294(6570): 470-474

Prospective randomized study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones

One hundred and twenty patients with known common bile duct stones were entered into a prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone clearance (group I) versus surgery alone (group 2). Five patients were incorrectly entered; the 55 patients randomised to group 1 and the 60 randomised to group 2 were well matched with respect to clinical features and biochemical and medical risk factors. In group 1 endoscopic stone clearance was successful in 50 patients (91%); five of these patients refused elective surgery, though this was subsequently necessary in one. In group 2 common bile duct stones were cleared surgically in 54 of 59 patients (91.5%); one patient was treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy alone because of a myocardial infarct. The overall major complication rate in group 1 was 16.4% and included two deaths; in group 2 this was 8.5% and included one death. The minor complication rate in group 1 was 16.4% and that in group 2 13.6%. These differences in outcome were not significant. Despite a significant reduction in total hospital stay patients in group 1, these results do not support the routine use of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients having biliary surgery for stones in the common bile duct.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 006206090

PMID: 3103731



Related references

Laparoscopic exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Digestive Surgery 28(5-6): 424-431, 2012

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation vs. sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized pilot study. Endoscopy 33(7): 563-567, 2001

Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones. Surgical Endoscopy 25(4): 1230-1237, 2011

Re: Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones. Surgical Endoscopy 25(8): 2758; Author Reply 2759-2758; Author Reply 2759, 2011

A meta-analysis of preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 95(18): 1425-1429, 2016

Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 144(2): 341-345.E1, 2013

Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 27(7): 2454-2465, 2014

Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones. British Journal of Surgery 98(7): 908-916, 2011

Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography: A multicenter, prospective controlled study. Surgery (St Louis) 124(1): 6-13, July, 1998

Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 908-916). British Journal of Surgery 99(1): 144; Author Reply 144-144; Author Reply 144, 2012