EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Regulation of growth and photosynthesis by oscillatoria agardhii grown with a light dark cycle


FEMS Microbiology Ecology 31(2): 97-102
Regulation of growth and photosynthesis by oscillatoria agardhii grown with a light dark cycle
The cyanobacterium Oscillatoria agardhii was grown in turbidostat cultures with the light energy supply in either the continuous mode or in the pulsed mode (8/16 h light/dark (L/D) cycle). The light irradiance value used was sufficient to allow the maximal growth rate to be attained, when supplied continuously. Adaptation of O. agardhii to the L/D cycle was characterized by an increase in pigment content and photosynthetic performance, accompanied by a decrease in growth rate. This mode of adaptation resembled the adaptation of O. agardhii to continuous low light intensities. It is suggested that in this case the L/D cycle provokes this adaptation in order to allow the cells to accumulate carbohydrate rapidly during the light period. This was attributed to the storage of polyglucose, which served as a carbon and energy source for growth in the dark. The utilization of polyglucose in the dark was able to sustain the synthesis of all other cell components at the same rate as when cells were growing in the light. The growth yield in the dark, whilst metabolizing internally stored polyglucose, was 0.52 g cell C/G polyglucose C, or 0.62 g cell dry weight/g polyglucose. Although in the pulsed mode there is a 66% loss in light irradiance per 24 h when compared with a continuous light regime, the growth rate of the cyanobacteria grown in the pulsed mode was only 35% lower than the growth rate of a culture grown in continuous light. This can be explained by a high growth yield in the dark and by increased CO2 fixation rates in the light of cells grown in the pulsed mode.


Accession: 006288281



Related references

Growth and physiology of oscillatoria agardhii cultivated in continuous culture with a light dark cycle. Archives of Microbiology 123(3): 315-318, 1979

Growth and physiology of Oscillatoria agardhii Gomont cultivated in continuous culture with a light-dark cycle. Archives of microbiology 123(3): 315-318, 1979

Interactions between temperature and light intensity on growth and photosynthesis of the cyanobacterium oscillatoria agardhii. Journal of Plankton Research 7(4): 487-496, 1985

Photosynthesis carbon flows and growth of oscillatoria agardhii in environments with a periodic supply of light. Journal of General Microbiology 132(8): 2129-2136, 1986

Photosynthesis, carbon flows and growth of Oscillatoria agardhii gomont in environments with a periodic supply of light. Journal of general microbiology 132(8): 2129-2136, 1986

Transient state characteristics of adaptation to changes in light conditions for the cyanobacterium oscillatoria agardhii i. pigmentation and photosynthesis. Archives of Microbiology 145(4): 353-357, 1986

Effects of photoperiodicity and light irradiance on phosphate limited oscillatoria agardhii in chemostat cultures 1. photosynthesis and carbohydrate storage. Archives of Microbiology 142(1): 66-71, 1985

Growth kinetics of oscillatoria agardhii in continuous culture limited in its growth by the light energy supply. Journal of General Microbiology 115(1): 153-160, 1979

Light dark cycle and temperature their impact on phosphate limited growth of oscillatoria redekei van goor in semicontinuous culture. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 71(3): 297-313, 1986

The influence of sodium calcium and iron on biomass growth in the blue algae oscillatoria agardhii and oscillatoria terebriformis. Studii si Cercetari de Biologie Seria Botanica 24(4): 349-356, 1972