EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Regulation of large coronary vessels by adrenergic mechanisms in conscious dogs


Basic Research in Cardiology 76(5): 508-517
Regulation of large coronary vessels by adrenergic mechanisms in conscious dogs
The effects of .alpha.- and .beta.-adrenergic stimulation were examined in conscious dogs on measurements of left circumflex coronary blood flow and coronary arterial diameter and on calculations of mean coronary resistance (MCR) and left circumflex coronary internal cross-sectional area (CSA). Methoxamine (50 .mu.g/kg per min), after transiently increasing left circumflex coronary dimensions, induced sustained reductions in left circumflex coronary diameter (9 .+-. 2%) and CSA (27 .+-. 5%) at a time when mean arterial pressure rose by 65 .+-. 5%, left ventricular (LV) dP/dt [change in pressure over time] had decreased only slightly, and heart rate and mean coronary blood flow were at control levels. Isoproterenol (0.1 .mu.g/kg per min) increased heart rate by 66 .+-. 8%, LV dP/dt by 58 .+-. 5%, and CSA by 17 .+-. 3%, while it decreased mean arterial pressure by 12 .+-. 1% and MCR by 44 .+-. 5%. After .beta.1-adrenergic receptor blockade and with heart rate held constant, isoproterenol did not increase LV dP/dt but decreased mean arterial pressure similarly (13 .+-. 2%) and induced attenuated increases in CSA (6 .+-. 1%), and decreases in MCR (17 .+-. 3%). After combined .beta.1- and .beta.2-adrenergic receptor blockades isoproterenol induced no significant effects. In the conscious dog, large coronary vessels not only react passively to changes in aortic pressure but also undergo substantial active changes. .alpha.-Adrenergic stimulation is sufficiently powerful to reduce CSA, despite the opposing elevation of distending pressure. Large vessels appear to be regulated by .beta.1-adrenergic mediated increase in myocardial metabolic demands and by .beta.2-adrenergic mediated vasodilation.

Accession: 006288964

PMID: 6272684

DOI: 10.1007/bf01908352

Download PDF Full Text: Regulation of large coronary vessels by adrenergic mechanisms in conscious dogs



Related references

Beta 1-adrenergic regulation of large coronary arteries in conscious dogs. Bibliotheca Cardiologica: 169-177, 1984

Regulation of large coronary vessels by augmented myo cardial metabolism in conscious dogs. Blood Vessels 17(3): 167, 1980

Regulation of large coronary arteries by beta-adrenergic mechanisms in the conscious dog. Circulation Research 51(1): 56-66, 1982

Effects of beta adrenergic blockades on epicardial coronary artery and coronary resistance vessels in conscious dogs. Japanese Circulation Journal 52(9): 1018, 1988

Different effects of mibefradil and amlodipine on coronary vessels and during beta-adrenergic stimulation in conscious dogs. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 40(6): 898-906, 2002

Effects of nifedipine on large and small coronary vessels in the presence and absence of coronary vaso constriction in conscious dogs. Circulation Supplement 62(3): III-253, 1980

Pathophysiological plasma ET-1 levels antagonize b-adrenergic dilation of coronary resistance vessels in conscious dogs. American Journal of Physiology 287(4): 476-H1483, 2004

Effects of acetyl choline on large coronary vessels in conscious dogs. Federation Proceedingspart 1: 707, 1981

Effect of 5 hydroxytryptamine 5 ht on large and resistance coronary vessels in conscious dogs. Japanese Circulation Journal 51(7): 713, 1987

Differential sensitivity of coronary conductance cv and resistance vessels rv to nitroglycerin ntg is due to different metabolic rather than local coronary hemodynamic or anatomic mechanisms in conscious dogs. FASEB Journal 6(5): A1802, 1992