EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Risk factors for complications of interval tubal sterilization by laparotomy



Risk factors for complications of interval tubal sterilization by laparotomy



Obstetrics and Gynecology 62(2): 180-184



The complication rate among 282 women undergoing interval tubal sterilization by laparotomy was studied as part of the prospective multicenter Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Using a standard definition of major complications, the overall complication rate was 5.7 per 100 procedures. Women experiencing complications had a significantly lengthened postoperative recovery period before the resumption of normal activities. Important risk factors for complications included diabetes, cigarette smoking, previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, and a history of pelvic inflammatory disease. Women with an initial abdominal incision of 7 cm or longer had three times the complication rate of women with shorter incisions. These results provide objective evidence that, for tubal sterilizations, minilaparotomy (laparotomy with a small abdominal incision) is associated with lower morbidity than is conventional laparotomy.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 006345150

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 6866361



Related references

Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization. Obstetrics & Gynecology 96(6): 997-1002, December, 2000

Complications of Interval Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization. Obstetrics & Gynecology 96(6): 997-1002, 2000

Complications of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 61(2): 153-158, 1983

Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Versus Standard Tubal Sterilization: Lessons From Offering Women Options for Interval Sterilization. Southern Medical Journal 111(3): 173-177, 2018

Intraoperative complications of outpatient interval tubal sterilization at a teaching hospital in Turkey. Saudi Medical Journal 29(5): 692-697, 2008

Risk factors for hysterectomy after tubal sterilization. American Journal of Epidemiology 132(4): 758-759, 1990

Unintended laparotomy associated with laparoscopic tubal sterilization. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 157(5): 1102-1105, 1987

Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy and mini-laparotomy. Advances in Contraception 9(4): 313-318, 1993

Risk factors for tubal sterilization regret, detectable before surgery. Contraception 54(3): 159-162, 1996

Emotional adjustment following tubal sterilization by laparoscopy and laparotomy in 1,052 women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 16(3): 173-176, 1976

Risk factors for uterine fibroids among women undergoing tubal sterilization. American Journal of Epidemiology 153(1): 20-26, 2001

Risk factors for regret after tubal sterilization: 5 years of follow-up in a prospective study. Fertility and Sterility 55(5): 927-933, 1991

Mini laparotomy for interval female sterilization. Fertility & Sterility 28(3): 324, 1977

Interval tubal sterilization via laparoscopy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 108(3): 458-461, 1970

Intrapartum and interval tubal sterilization. Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira 52(5): 323-327, 2006