+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Selection at electrophoretic loci for reproductive parameters in island and mainland voles

Evolution 32(1): 15-28
Selection at electrophoretic loci for reproductive parameters in island and mainland voles
A 3-yr live-trapping study was conducted on 2 spp. of voles, Microtus breweri, endemic to Muskeget Island, Massachusetts [USA] and M. pennsylvanicus, its mainland counterpart. Monthly rotation of trap lines on 4 areas on both the island and the mainland was carried out. Genetic loci (15) were examined by horizontal starch gel electrophoresis of blood samples. M. pennsylvanicus was polymorphic for both transferrin (Tf) and leucine aminopeptidase (Lap), while M. breweri was polymorphic only for Tf. The 4 M. breweri trapping areas were genetically homogeneous, while the 4 M. pennsylvanicus areas were not. Both the Tf and Lap polymorphisms were balanced in both species. There were no deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and no significant differences between male and female gene frequencies at either locus. A negative relationship for TfE frequency and density was found in both species. Voles were autopsied and reproductive data taken. In M. pennsylvanicus males the LapS/LapS homozygote had the highest index of breeding activity and the LapF/LapF homozygote the lowest. In M. pennsylvanicus females the LapS/LapF heterozygote possessed the highest index of breeding activity, and the LapF/LapF homozygote the lowest. None of the environmental, reproductive, or demographic variables examined in M. breweri showed any statistically significant relation to the genetic data except for differences in day caught in males. M. breweri appears to be non-cyclic and to have undergone numerous genetic bottlenecks in the past. From 15 loci analyzed electrophoretically, an estimate of genetic distance between M. breweri and M. pennsylvanicus was calculated. The estimate categorized the 2 populations as probably conspecific.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 006380307

DOI: 10.2307/2407407

Related references

Trap use as an indicator of social behavior in mainland voles microtus pennsylvanicus and island voles microtus breweri. Acta Theriologica 25(22-31): 295-307, 1980

Dispersal in island and mainland voles. Ecology (Washington D C) 58(5): 1044-1054, 1977

Trap use as an indicator of social behavior in mainland and island voles. Acta Theriologica, 2523: 295-307, 1980

Evaluation of genetic diversity in island and mainland populations of Far Eastern voles Microtus fortis (Rodentia, Crcetidae ): data of RAPD-PCR analysis. North Pacific Islands Biological Researches ember; 9: 1-18, 2003

Habitat selection in island vs mainland birds. 1986

Evidence for selection at cytokine loci in a natural population of field voles (Microtus agrestis). Molecular Ecology 21(7): 1632-1646, 2012

Habitat selection in island versus mainland birds. Unknown, 1985

Odor selection of island beach voles during their nonbreeding season. Journal of Mammalogy, 713: 397-401, 1990

Neonatal injections affect reproductive parameters in male prairie voles. Hormones & Behavior 39(4): 324, June, 2001

Reproductive biology of island and mainland populations of Primula mistassinica (Primulaceae) on Lake Huron shorelines. Canadian Journal of Botany 76(11): 1819-1827, 1998