EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Selection for reduced bolting susceptibility in beet and swedes and the influence of environmental factors on bolting


Kongelige Veterinaer- og Landbohojskole Arsskrift : 138-158
Selection for reduced bolting susceptibility in beet and swedes and the influence of environmental factors on bolting
The frequency of bolters increased from late June-Oct. The number of bolters appearing before Aug. 20th. showed close agreement with the number of flowering and seed-bearing bolters (Early Bolters) at the end of the season. High levels of N fertilizer and early applications resulted in considerably more bolters than low N levels and late applications. Marked differences in bolting susceptibility were found between plants grown from seed lots of the same variety but produced in different years. Seed produced and after-ripened in the field gave 2-19 times more bolters with normal sowing times than seed produced and after-ripened under greenhouse conditions. Seed after-ripened in the field gave 32-54% more bolters than corresponding seed after-ripened in a greenhouse. In general the environment under which the seed is produced is considered to have a greater effect on bolting susceptibility than post-harvest ripening conditions. Three generations of selection reduced bolting susceptibility by 88-98% relative to the original variety. It was possible to select individuals susceptible to bolting from a beet population using the rate of stem formation as a criterion. Selection for reduced bolting susceptibility did not result in decreased dry matter productivity.


Accession: 006380635



Related references

The bolting of beet, mangels, swedes, and turnips in 1938. Sveriges Utsadesforen Tidskr 49(4): 326-335, 1939

Bolting and flowering control in sugar beet: relationships and effects of gibberellin, the bolting gene B and vernalization. Aob Plants 2010(): Plq012-Plq012, 2010

The problem of the degree of correspondence in the order of tendency to bolting in different methods of testing for bolting resistance in sugar beet. Zuchter. 35: 214-18, 1965

Time course and amplitude of DNA methylation in the shoot apical meristem are critical points for bolting induction in sugar beet and bolting tolerance between genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 62(8): 2585-2597, 2011

On sugar beet bolting in the warm region. II. On the bolting behaviour of autumn-sown sugar beet.. Hyogo Noka Daigaku Kenkyu Hokoku : Nogaku Hen/Sci. Rep. Hyogo Univ. Agric. : Ser. Agric, 4: 159-64, 1960

Environmental influence during beet seed production on bolting and quality characteristics of the subsequent root crop. J. int. Inst. Sugar Beet Res, 4: 4, 207-16. Bibl. 12, 1970

Earlier-bolting spinach cultivars respond to a wider spectrum of night-break light for bolting than later-bolting cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 60(3): 191-195, 2004

The influence of cultivation and selection conditions on the productivity and bolting of sugar beet progeny, using larger spacing distances.. Sahar. Svekla (Sug. Beet). 2, 13-17, 1960

Studies on bolting and flowering of sugar beet. I. Correlation between height of bolting plants and flowering date. Bulletin of Sugar Beet Research Tensai Kenkyu Hokoku (Suppl. 13): 105-114, 1971

Effects of sowing date on plant establishment and bolting and the influence of these factors on yields of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science 101(1): 147-162, 1983