EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Specimen volume vs. yield in the bactec blood culture system


Journal of Clinical Microbiology 22(2): 292-295
Specimen volume vs. yield in the bactec blood culture system
In 24-mo., 5625 blood culture specimens were collected at the Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center, Washington, USA, in 20 ml vol and divided into separate 10 ml aliquots. The 2 aliquots were processed as duplicate sets (set 1, set 2) by the BACTEC radiometric detection system. Specimens (5 ml) from each set were inoculated into aerobic (6B) and anaerobic (7C/7D) vials; 434 significantly positive blood cultures were found. In 342 of these positive cultures, yielding 379 isolates (112 members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 104 staphylococci, 87 streptococci, 27 anaerobes, 20 yeasts, 14 pseudomonads and 15 miscellaneous organisms), there was adequate specimen vol to fill all 4 vials. The utilization of set 1 would have resulted only in the failure to detect 65 of 379 (17.2%) significant isolates, 52 of 342 (15.2%) positive cultures, and 20 of 198 (10.1%) bacteremic episodes. There were no significant differences in the recovery of individual species in sets 1 and 2. Although the range of isolates recovered by the aerobic and anaerobic vials of each set differed, the percent yield of total isolates was similar, indicating total isolate yield was predominantly a function of specimen vol. The addition of set 2 most dramatically increased the recovery of Escherichia coli (30%), yeasts (33%) and anaerobes (42%).


Accession: 006459274



Related references

Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 22(2): 292-295, 1985

Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 31(4): 865-871, 1993

Impact of monitoring blood volume in the BD BACTECâ„¢ FX blood culture system: virtual volume versus actual volume. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 81(2): 89-93, 2015

Comparison of the bactec 460 blood culture system with the bactec plus the septi chek blood culture system. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 89: 430, 1989

Microbiological comparison of a new infra-red blood culture system (Bactec NR 600) and a radiometric system (Bactec 460). Medical Laboratory Sciences 44(2): 150-159, 1987

Evaluation of BACTEC 9240 blood culture system by using high-volume aerobic resin media. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33(9): 2451-2453, 1995

Microbiological comparison of a new ir blood culture system bactec nr 660 and a radiometric system bactec 460. Medical Laboratory Sciences 44(2): 150-159, 1987

Effects of altered headspace atmosphere on yield and speed of detection of the oxoid signal blood culture system versus the bactec radiometric system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28(4): 795-797, 1990

Effect of altered headspace atmosphere on yield and speed of detection of the Oxoid Signal blood culture system versus the BACTEC radiometric system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28(4): 795-797, 1990

Effect of agitation and terminal subcultures on yield and speed of detection of the Oxoid Signal blood culture system versus the BACTEC radiometric system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 27(3): 427-430, 1989